Contemporary institutional challenges in national innovation policy governance in Poland and Sweden in the context of the European Union’s competitiveness

2026, No. 3

University of the National Education Commission, Krakow (Cracow, Poland)


Publication date

24.09.2026

Submission date

20.07.2026

Acceptance date

06.08.2026

Publishing model

open access

License type


Field

Social sciences

Discipline

political and administrative sciences, international relations, sociology, law, economics and finance, management and quality studies, social communication and media studies

Language of publication

English

Number of views:38

Number of downloads:0

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

This article presents a theory-informed benchmark comparison of national innovation policy governance in Poland and Sweden, and it also examines how governance capacity is associated with EU competitiveness. The study combines conceptual analysis, official institutional documents and data from European Innovation Scoreboard 2026. The comparison is focused on five governance dimensions: political anchoring, stakeholder architecture, links between strategy and instruments, demand-side capacity, transparency and institutional learning. Sweden is chosen for the analysis as a historical functional benchmark, while Poland is assessed in the institutional form introduced on 4 November 2025 by Prime Minister’s Order no. 62 amending the order establishing the Council for Innovation. The evidence indicates that the innovation gap is associated not only with expenditure, but also with coordination, participation, transparency and implementation capacity.

Keywords:

Bibliography

BORRÁS Susana, EDQUIST Charles (2013), The choice of innovation policy instruments, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 80, issue 8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002

EDLER Jakob, GEORGHIOU Luke (2007), Public procurement and innovation – Resurrecting the demand side, “Research Policy”, vol. 36, issue 7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003

EDQUIST Charles (2011), Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems, “Industrial and Corporate Change”, vol. 20, issue 6.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr060

EDQUIST Charles (2016), The Swedish National Innovation Council: Innovation policy governance to replace linearity with holism, “CIRCLE Paper in Innovation Studies”, no. 2016/24.

EDQUIST Charles (2018), Towards a Holistic Innovation Policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council Serve as a Role Model?, “CIRCLE Paper in Innovation Studies”, no. 2018/2.

EDQUIST Charles (2019), Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council be a role model?, “Research Policy”, vol. 48, issue 4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008

EDQUIST Charles, HOMMEN Leif, TSIPOURI Lena (eds.) (2000), Public Technology Procurement and Innovation, Springer.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4611-5

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2026a), European Innovation Scoreboard 2026, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

https://doi.org/10.2777/4615399

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2026b), European Innovation Scoreboard 2026: Country profile Poland. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/assets/rtd/eis/2026/ec_rtd_eis-country-profile-pl.pdf (31.07.2026).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2026c), European Innovation Scoreboard 2026: Country profile Sweden. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/assets/rtd/eis/2026/ec_rtd_eis-country-profile-se.pdf (31.07.2026).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2026d), Commission Staff Working Document: 2026 Country Report: Poland, Accompanying the document: Recommendation for a Council Recommendation on the economic, social, employment, structural and budgetary policies of Poland {COM(2026) 221 final}, SWD(2026) 221 final, Brussels, 3.06.2026.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2026e), Commission Staff Working Document: 2026 Country Report: Sweden, Accompanying the document: Recommendation for a Council Recommendation on the economic, social, employment, structural and budgetary policies of Sweden {COM(2026) 227 final}, SWD(2026) 227 final, Brussels, 3.06.2026.

GOVERNMENT OFFICES OF SWEDEN (2016), National Public Procurement Strategy, Ministry of Finance, Stockholm.

KWIECIŃSKI Leszek (2014), Proinnovative Policy and the National Innovation System. A case study from Poland, “Central and Eastern European Review”, vol. 8(1).

https://doi.org/10.2478/caeer-2014-0006

MAZZUCATO Mariana (2011), The Entrepreneurial State, London.

NORTH Douglass C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press.

OECD (2011), Demand-side Innovation Policies, OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264098886-en

OECD (2013), OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Sweden 2012, OECD Publishing, Paris.

https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264184893-en

PREZES RADY MINISTRÓW (2016), Zarządzenie nr 4 Prezesa Rady Ministrów z dnia 18 stycznia 2016 r. w sprawie utworzenia Rady do spraw Innowacyjności, „Monitor Polski” 2016, poz. 63.

PREZES RADY MINISTRÓW (2025), Zarządzenie nr 62 Prezesa Rady Ministrów z dnia 4 listopada 2025 r. zmieniające zarządzenie w sprawie utworzenia Rady do spraw Innowacyjności, „Monitor Polski” 2025, poz. 1145.

PREZES RADY MINISTRÓW (2026), Zarządzenie nr 26 Prezesa Rady Ministrów z dnia 31 marca 2026 r. w sprawie Rady Przyszłości, „Monitor Polski” 2026, poz. 351.

SROKA Jacek (2025), Zbyt wiele, czy zbyt mało opcji? Przyczyny braku synergii w reżimie wiedzy oraz widoki na modelowanie zmian z wykorzystaniem metod współczesnego behawioralizmu publicznego, „Studia z Polityki Publicznej”, vol. 13, no. 3.

https://doi.org/10.33119/KSzPP/2025.3.3

Similar publications