Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Przegląd Europejski

Kryzys innowacyjności w Europie

2015, 2015 (35), Numer 1

Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse

0000-0002-7270-8900

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.1.15.1

Data publikacji

28.06.2015

Model publikowania

open access

Rodzaj licencji

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Dziedzina

Dziedzina nauk społecznych

Dyscyplina

ekonomia i finanse, nauki o komunikacji społecznej i mediach, nauki o polityce i administracji, nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości, nauki prawne, nauki socjologiczne, stosunki międzynarodowe

Język publikacji

Polski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 329 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:116

Liczba pobrań:6

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0

Abstrakt

The European Union is gradually losing competitive advantage against the biggest rivals on a global scale, due to the difficulty of creating new technologies and their application in the economy. This process is related to the withdrawal from industrial policy, which has its source in focusing the European integration on neoliberal common market, open to outside competitors. Moreover, the main trajectory of development of the EU was the expansion of the common market, achieved by successive rounds of enlargement of the Community, rather than building competitive advantages on a global scale. Added to this are the problems of the EU innovation policy related to the troubles in the coordination of national policies, bureaucratic obstacles, as well as the deficit of offsetting the differences of innovative economy in the whole Community.<br>Unia Europejska stopniowo traci przewagę konkurencyjną w stosunku do największych rywali w skali globalnej, co wynika z trudności tworzenia nowoczesnych technologii i ich aplikacji w gospodarce. Utrata przewagi wiąże się z zanikiem polityki przemysłowej i ma swoje źródło w ukierunkowaniu integracji europejskiej na rozwój neoliberalnego wspólnego rynku, dodatkowo otwartego na zewnętrznych konkurentów. Główną trajektorią rozwoju w UE była ponadto ekspansja wspólnego rynku, przede wszystkim w wyniku kolejnych rund poszerzania Wspólnoty, a nie budowanie przewag konkurencyjnych w skali globalnej. Nałożyły się na to problemy samej polityki innowacyjnej UE, związane z jej kłopotami w zakresie koordynacji polityk narodowych, utrudnieniami biurokratycznymi i deficytem wyrównywania różnic innowacyjnej gospodarki w skali całej Wspólnoty.

Słowa kluczowe:

Bibliografia

AMIN Ash, TOMANY John (1995), Behind the Myth of the European Union: Prospectsfor Cohesion, London – New York.

APELDOORN Bastiaan van (2002), Transnational capitalism and the struggle over Europeanintegration, Abingdon, Oxford, New York.

ARCHIBUGI Daniele, FILIPPETTI Andrea (2011), Is the Economic Crisis ImpairingConvergence in Innovation Performance across Europe?, „Journal ofCommon Market Studies”, Vol. 49, nr 6.

ATHREYE Suma, HUANG Can, SOETE Luc (2010), An ‘outward-looking’ LisbonStrategy: a solution for challenges of the knowledge economy in the EU, Chinaand India, w: Heiko Prange-Gstöhl (red.), International Science and TechnologyCooperation in a Globalized World. The External Dimension of the EuropeanResearch Area, Cheltenham, Northampton.

BANCHOFF Thomas (2002), Institutions, inertia and European Union researchpolicy, „ Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 40, nr 1.

BÓGDAŁ-BRZEZIŃSKA Agnieszka (2012), Międzynarodowe struktury wiedzyi innowacji – mechanizmy zmiany, aktualne trendy i uczestnicy, w: Edward Haliżak(red.), Geoekonomia, Warszawa.

CHOU Meng-Hsuan (2012), Constructing an internal market for research throughsectoral and lateral strategies: layering, the European Commission and the fifthfreedom, „ Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 19, nr 7.

CITI Manuele (2014), Revisiting Creeping Competences in the EU: The Case ofSecurity R&D Policy, “Journal of European Integration”, Vol. 36, nr 2.

COHEN Benjamin J. (2009), Dollar Dominance, Euro Aspirations: Recipe for Discord?,„Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 47, nr 4.

DEEG Richard E. (2012), Innovation Financing In Europe: What Has Financial MarketIntegration Brought?, w: Mitchell P. Smith (red.), Europe and National EconomicTransformation. The EU after the Lisbon Decade, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

DOSI Giovanni, LLERENA Patrick, LABINI Mauro Sylos (2009), Does the ‘EuropeanParadox’ still hold? Did it ever?, w: Henri Delange, Ugur Muldur, Luc Soete (red.), European Science and Technology Policy. Towards Integration or Fragmentation?, Cheltenham – Northampton.

DUCHÊNE Vincent, LYKOGIANNI Elissavet, VERBEEK Arnold (2009), The EUR&D under-investment: patterns in R&D expenditure and financing, w: HenriDelange, Ugur Muldur, Luc Soete (red.), European Science and TechnologyPolicy. Towards Integration or Fragmentation?, Cheltenham – Northampton.

EDLER Jakob (2012), Research and Innovation and the Lisbon Strategy, w: PaulCopeland, Dimitris Papadimitriou (red.), The EU’s Lisbon Strategy. EvaluatingSuccess, Understanding Failure, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

ELERA Álvaro de (2006), The European Research Area: On the Way Towardsa European Scientific Community?, „European Law Journal”, Vol. 12, nr 5.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2011), Fourth FP7 Monitoring Report, MonitoringReport 2010, 4 August, Brussels.

FAGERBERG Jan, VERSPAGEN Bart, CANIELS Marjolein (1997), Technology,Growth and Unemployment across European Regions, „ Regional Studies”, Vol.31, nr 5.

FILIPPETTI Andrea, PEYRACHE Antonio (2013), Is the Convergence PartyOver? Labour Productivity and the Technology Gap in Europe, „ Journal ofCommon Market Studies”, Vol. 51, nr 6.

GODDARD John Gabriel (2012), Rekindling the EU’s Economic Growth throughScience and Innovation: Can the Europe 2020 Strategy Step Up to the Challenge?,w: Robert M. Solow, Daniel S. Hamilton (red.), Europe’s Economic Crisis.Transatlantic Perspectives, Washington.

GORNITZKA Åse (2009), Research policy and the European Union – multi-layeredpolicy change?, w: Patrick Clancy, David D. Dill (red.), The Research Missionof the University Policy Reforms and Institutional Response, Rotterdam.

GRANIERI Massimiliano, RENDA Andrea (2012), Innovation Law and Policy inthe European Union. Towards Horizon 2020, Berlin – Milano.

GROSSE Tomasz Grzegorz (2012a), Egzogeniczna gospodarka w Polsce. Modelkapitalizmu wynikający z przemian politycznych, „Nierówności społecznea wzrost gospodarczy”, Zeszyt 24.

GROSSE Tomasz Grzegorz (2012b), W objęciach europeizacji, Warszawa.

GROSSE Tomasz Grzegorz (2014a), Geoeconomic Relations Between the EU and China: The Lessons From the EU Weapon Embargo and From Galileo, „Geopolitics”,Vol. 19, nr 1.

GROSSE Tomasz Grzegorz (2014b), Geoekonomia jako paradygmat zarządzaniarozwojem – przykład Chin, „Zarządzanie Publiczne”, nr 2 (24).

GROSSE Tomasz Grzegorz (2014c), W poszukiwaniu geoekonomii w Europie,Warszawa.

HAQUE Nadeem U., Kim Se-Jik (1995), Human Capital Flight: Impact of Migrationon Income and Growth, „ IMF Staff Papers”, Vol. 42, nr 3.

HOEFFLER Catherine (2012), European armament co-operation and the renewalof industrial policy motives, „ Journal of European Public Policy”, Vol. 19, nr 3.

INNOVATION UNION Scoreboard 2011 (2012), Brussels.

JACOBY Wade (2010), Managing globalization by managing Central and EasternEurope: the EU’s backyard as threat and opportunity, „ Journal of EuropeanPublic Policy”, Vol. 17, nr 3.

JAKUBIAK Andrzej (2012), Wpływ Bazylei III i innych nowych regulacji unijnychi polskich na politykę kredytową i sytuację instytucjonalną sektora bankowegow Polsce, prezentacja na konferencji pt. „Zmiany regulacji a rozwój sektorabankowego”, Warszawa, 12 kwietnia rok?

JANOS Andrew C. (2000), East Central Europe in the Modern World: The Politicsof the Borderlands From Pre- to Postcommunism, Stanford.

JASIECKI Krzysztof (2013), Kapitalizm po polsku, Warszawa.

JONES Seth G. (2007), The rise of European security cooperation, Cambridge –New York.

JUNGMITTAG Andre (2004), Innovations, Technological Specialization and EconomicGrowth in the EU, „ International Economics and Economic Policy”, Vol.1, nr 2–3.

KAISER Robert, PRANGE Heiko (2004), Managing diversity in a system of multi--level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy, „Journalof European Public Policy”, 11:2.

KRIPPNER Greta R. (2011), Capitalizing on Crisis. The Political Origins of theRise of Finance, Cambridge – London.

KROTZ Ulrich (2011), Flying Tiger. International Relations Theory and the Politicsof Advanced Weapons, Oxford – New York.

KROTZ Ulrich, SCHILD Joachim (2013), Shaping Europe. France, Germany, andEmbedded Bilateralism from Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics,Oxford – New York.

LIAGOURAS George (2010), What can we learn from the failures of technologyand innovation policies in the European periphery? „ European Urban and RegionalStudies”, Vol. 17, nr 3.

LORENZ Edward, LUNDVALL Bengt-Åke (2006), How Europe’s Economies Learn,Oxford – New York.

LOWELL B. Lindsay (2001), Skilled Temporary and Permanent Immigrantsin the United States, „Population Research and Policy Review”, Vol. 20,nr 1–2.

McGUINNESS Nina, O’CARROLL Conor (2010), Benchmarking Europe’s LabBenches: How Successful has the OMC been in Research Policy?, „ Journal ofCommon Market Studies”, Vol. 48, nr 2.

MEDVE-BÁLINT Gergő (2014), The Role of the EU in Shaping FDI Flows to EastCentral Europe, „ Journal of Common Market Studies”, Vol. 52, nr 1.

MIYAGIWA K. (1991), Scale Economies in Education and the Brain Drain Problem,„ International Economic Review”, Vol. 32, nr 3.

NÖLKE Andreas, VLIEGENTHART Arjan (2009), Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism.The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe,„ World Politics”, Vol. 61, nr 4.

ORENSTEIN Mitchell A. (2014), Poland. From Tragedy to Triumph, „Foreign Affairs”,Vol. 93, nr 1.

PADOAN Pier Carlo (2011), Europe’s Growth: A Sceptical View, w: Loukas Tsoukalis,Janis A. Emmanouilidis (red.), The Delphic Oracle on Europe. Is There a Future forthe European Union, Oxford – New York.

PINTO Hugo, PEREIRA Tiago Santos (2013), Efficiency of Innovation Systems inEurope: An Institutional Approach to the Diversity of National Profiles, „ EuropeanPlanning Studies”, Vol. 21, nr 6.

POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE Bruno van (2008), Europe’s R&D: Missingthe Wrong Targets?, „Intereconomics”, July–August.

PRANGE-GSTÖHL Heiko (2010), The European Research Area ‚goes global‘: anintroduction, w: Heiko Prange-Gstöhl (red.), International Science and Techno logy Cooperation in a Globalized World. The External Dimension of the EuropeanResearch Area, Cheltenham, Northampton.

RUITER Rik de (2010), Variations on a Theme. Governing the Knowledge-BasedSociety in the EU through Methods of Open Coordination in Education andR&D, „ Journal of European Integration”, Vol. 32, nr 2.

SOETE Luc (2009a), Some reflections on innovation Policy, w: M. J. Rodrigues(red.), Europe, Globalization and the Lisbon Agenda, Cheltenham, Northampton.

SOETE Luc (2009b), The European Research Area as industrial Policy tool, w: HenriDelange, Ugur Muldur, Luc Soete (red.), European Science and TechnologyPolicy. Towards Integration or Fragmentation?, Cheltenham – Northampton.

STAJANO Attilio (2009), Research, Quality, Competitiveness. European UnionTechnology Policy for the Knowledge-based Society, Berlin – Milano.

ŠVARC Jadranka, LAŽNJAK Jasminka, PERKOVIĆ Juraj (2013), Integrationof the Western Balkan Countries and Turkey in the Framework Programmes:Some Empirical Evidence, „ Journal of European Integration”, Vol. 35, nr 1.

UGUR Mehmet, GUNER Umit (2012), Innovation and Competition in the EU15:Empirical Evidence on the Lisbon Decade and Beyond, w: Mitchell P. Smith(red.), Europe and National Economic Transformation. The EU after the LisbonDecade, Houndmills, Basingstoke.

WONG Kar-yiu, YIP Chong Kee (1999), Education, Economic Growth, and BrainDrain, „ Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control”, Vol. 23, nr 5–6.

ZWAN Arie van der (2010), The coordination of international S&T policies fromthe perspective of EU member states, w: Heiko Prange-Gstöhl (red.), InternationalScience and Technology Cooperation in a Globalized World. The ExternalDimension of the European Research Area, Cheltenham, Northampton.

Podobne publikacje