pl
Oryginalny artykuł naukowy
Przegląd Europejski – European Studies Quarterly

Zasada proporcjonalnej ostrożności jako instrumentalny środek zapobiegawczy w walce z COVID-19: czy europejska koncepcja praw człowieka przetrwa stan zagrożenia zdrowia publicznego?

2021, 2021, Numer 1

Jizeng Fan

0000-0002-9106-5031

Sichuan University (Chengdu, China)

Yuhong Wang

0000-0003-3167-0237

Sichuan University (Chengdu, China)

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.1.21.7

Data publikacji

14.04.2021

Model publikowania

open access

Rodzaj licencji

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Dziedzina

Dziedzina nauk społecznych

Dyscyplina

stosunki międzynarodowe, ekonomia i finanse, nauki o komunikacji społecznej i mediach, nauki o polityce i administracji, nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości, nauki prawne, nauki socjologiczne

Język publikacji

Angielski, Polski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 262 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:736

Liczba pobrań:22

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0

Abstrakt

Autorzy wychodzą z założenia, że koncepcja nieograniczonej suwerenności С.Schmitta nie jest pozbawiona wad. Zarówno brytyjska teoria prawa konstytucyjnego A. Dicey’a, jak i międzynarodowe instrumenty dotyczące praw człowieka wymagają, aby stosowanie środków ograniczających prawa człowieka było zgodne z zasadą proporcjonalności. Jednak te wymogi normatywne były rzadko wykorzystywane do sądowej kontroli przez dwa ponadnarodowe sądy w Europie. Odpowiednio, władze publiczne niektórych państw europejskich preferują bardziej radykalną zasadę ostrożności. Chociaż wykazuje ona większą skuteczność w powstrzymywaniu koronawirusa, wiążą się z jej stosowaniem liczne skutki uboczne. W odpowiedzi na wskazane problemy autorzy proponują w niniejszym artykule innowacyjną koncepcję zasady proporcjonalnej ostrożności

Słowa kluczowe:

COVID-19,Europa,koronawirus,prawa człowieka,suwerenność,zasada praworządności,ochrona praw podstawowych,zasada proporcjonalności,zasada ostrożności

Bibliografia

ACKERMANN Bruce (2004), The Emergency Constitution, "Yale Law Journal", vol.113, no. 1.

https://doi.org/10.2307/4135710

ALEXY Robert (2002), A Theory of Constitutional Rights, Oxford University Press.

ALEXY Robert (2003), On the Balancing of Subsumption. A Structural Comparison, "Ratio Juris", vol. 16, no. 4.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0952-1917.2003.00244.x

BJORNSKOV Christan, VOIGT Stefan (2018), The Architecture of Emergency Constitution, "International Journal of Constitutional Law", vol. 16, no. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy012

BREYER Stephen G. (2003), Liberty, Security and Courts, https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/speeches/sp_04-15-03.html (15.12.2020).

BVerfGE (1978), Entscheidungen Der Amtlichen Sammlung, 49, 89.

BVefvGE (1979), Entscheidungen Der Amtlichen Sammlung, 50, 290.

BVerfGE (1994), Entscheidungen Der Amtlichen Sammlung, 90, 145.

CANESTRINI Nicola (2020), Covid-19 Italian Emergency Legislation and Infection of the Rule of Law, "New Journal of European Criminal Law", vol. 11, no. 2.

https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420934669

CROSBY Lauren, CROSBY Edward (2020), Applying the Precautionary Principle to Personal Protective Equipment Guidance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Did We Learn the Lessons from the SARS, "Canadian Journal of Anesthesiologist", vol.67, no. 10.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01760-y

DICEY Albert V. (1920), Introduction to the Study of Law of Constitution, LiberyFund.

DICEY Albert V. (1979), Introduction to the Study of Law of Constitution, Macmillan.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17968-8

DYZENHAUS David (2006a), Schmitt v. Dicey: Are State of Emergency Inside or Outside the Legal Order?, "Cardozo Law Review", vol. 27, no. 5.

DYZENHAUS David (2006b), The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency, Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618246

DYZENHAUS David (2008), The Compulsion of Legality, in: Victor V. Ramraj (ed.), Emergency and The Limits of Legality, Cambridge.

DYZENHAUS David (2012), State of Emergency, in: Michel Rosenfeld, András Sajó (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford.

DE SCHUTTER Oliver (2010), International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary, Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779312

ECtHR (1961), European Court of Human Rights, Lawless vs. Ireland (no.3), ap. no. 332/57, judgment 1 July 1961.

ECtHR (1978), European Court of Human Rights, Ireland vs. UK, ap. no. 5310/71, decision 18 January 1978.

ECtHR (1988), European Court of Human Rights, Brogan and Others vs. UK, ap. no. 11209/84, judgment 29 November 1988.

ECtHR (1993), European Court of Human Rights, Brannigan & McBride vs. UK, ap. no. 14553/89 and 14554/89, judgment 25 May 1993

ECtHR (2005), European Court of Human Rights, Enhorn vs. Sweden, ap. no. 56529/00, judgment 25 January 2005.

ECtHR (2009), European Court of Human Rights, A and others vs. UK, ap. no. 3455/05, judgment 19 February 2009.

ECtHR (2018), European Court of Human Rights, Mehmet Hasan Altan vs. Turkey, ap. no.13237/17, judgment 20 March 2018.

ECtHR (2019a), European Court of Human Rights, Alparslan Altan vs. Turkey, ap. no.12778/17, judgment 16 April 2019.

ECtHR (2019b), European Court of Human Rights, Kavala vs. Turkey, ap. no.28749/18, judgment 10 December 2019.

ECtHR (2020), European Court of Human Rights, Bas vs. Turkey, ap. no. 66448/17, judgment 3 March 2020.

FEREJOHN John, PASQUINO Pasquale (2002), The Law of the Exception: A Typology of Emergency Powers, "International Journal of Constitutional Law", vol. 2, no. 2.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/2.2.210

GARNETT Kenisha, PARSON David J. (2017), Multi-Case Review of the Application of Precautionary Principle in the European Law and Case-law, "Risk Analysis", vol. 37, no. 3.

https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12633

GOVERNO ITALIANO (2020), Misure urgenti in materia di contenimento e gestione dell' emergenza epidemologica da COVID-19, Discreto-Legge 23 Febrario 2020, no. 6.

GREENE Alan (2018), Permanent States of Emergency and the Rule of Law: Constitutions in the Age of Crisis, Oxford.

GREENE Alan (2020), Derogating from the European Convention on Human Rights in Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic: If Not Now, When?, SSRN, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3593358 (17.12.2020).

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593358

GROSS Oren, NÍ AOLÁIN Fionnuala (2001), From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights, "Human Rights Quarterly", vol. 23, no. 3.

https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2001.0035

GROSS Oren, NÍ AOLÁIN Fionnuala (2006), Law in Time of Crisis: Emergency Power in Theory and Practice, Cambridge.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493997

HOUSE OF LORDS (2005), A vs. Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2 W.L.R 87.

HRC (2001), CCPR General Comment No. 29: Article 4: Derogations during a State of Emergency, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (1996) of 8 May 1996, The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte National Farmers' Union and Others, CASE 157/96.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2000) of 22 June 2000, Fornasar and Others, CASE 318/98.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2009) of 5 March 2009, Commission vs Spain, CASE C-88/07.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2011) of 21 July 2011, Etimine SA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, CASE 15/10.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2016) of 9 June 2016, Pesce and Others, CASES 78/16 and 79/16.

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (2019) of 1 October 2019, Blaise and Others, criminal proceedings, CASE 616/17.

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (2011) of 9 September 2011, France vs. Commission, CASE 257/07.

LINDAHL Lars (2009), Robert Alexy's Weight Formula for Weighing and Balancing, in: Augusto Silva Dias et. al. (eds.), Líber Amicorum de José de Sousa Brito em comemoração do 70.º Aniversário - Estudos de Direito e Filosofia, Almedina.

MOWBRAY Alastair (2012), Cases, Materials, and Commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford.

https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199577361.001.0001

MESSERSCHMIDT Klaus (2020), COVID-19 Legislation in the Light of the Precautionary Principle, "The Theory and Practice of Legislation", vol. 8, no. 3.

https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2020.1783627

PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY, The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on human rights and the rule of law, AS/JUR (2020) 13, Strasbourg.

PINTO-BAZURCO Jose Felix (2020), The Precautionary Principle, "Earth Negotiation Bulletin", Brief #4, https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-10/still-one-earth-precautionary-principle.pdf (23.12.2020).

SCHMITT Carl (2005), Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty, Chicago.

https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738901.001.0001

SCHMITT Carl (2008), Constitutional Theory, Durham.

https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589

SCHMITT Carl (2013), Dictatorship: From the Origin of the Modern Concept of Sovereignty to Proletarian Class Struggles, Cambridge.

SCOTT Joanne (2018), Legal Aspects of Precautionary Principle, London.

SPADARO Alessandra (2020), COVID-19: Testing the Limits of Human Rights, "European Journal of Risk Regulation", vol. 11, no. 2.

https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.27

SCHLINK Bernhard (2011), Proportionality in the Constitutional Law, Why Everywhere But Here?, "Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law", vol. 22, no. 2.

SCHEININ Martin (2020), COVID-19 Symposium: To Derogate or not to Derogate, "Opinio Juris", http://opiniojuris.org/2020/04/06/covid-19-symposium-to-derogate-or-not-to-derogate/(28.12.2020).

SUNSTEIN Cass R. (2004), Minimalism at War, "The Supreme Court Review", vol. 45, no. 1

https://doi.org/10.1086/scr.2004.3536968

TZEVELEKOS Vassilis P., DZEHTSIAROU Kanstantsin (2020), Normal as Usual? Human Rights in Times of COVID-19, "European Convention on Human Rights Law Review", vol. 1, no. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-00102001

VENICE COMMISSION (2006), Opinion on the Protection of Human Rights in Emergency Situations, CDL-AD(2006)015, Strasbourg.

VENICE COMMISSION (2016), Turkey, Opinion on the Legal Framework Governing Curfews, CDL-AD(2016)010, Strasbourg.

VENICE COMMISSION (2020), Venice Commission Opinions and Reports on States of Emergency, CDL-PI(2020)003, Strasbourg.

WALLACE Stuart (2020), Derogation from the European Convention on Human Rights: The Case for Reform, "Human Rights Law Review", vol. 20, no. 3.

https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaa036

WHO (2020a), Modes of Transmission of Virus Causing COVID-19: Implication for IPC Precaution Recommendations, https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/modes-of-transmissionof-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations (12.12.2020).

WHO (2020b), Statement on the First Meeting of the International Health Regulations, Emergency Committee Regarding the Outbreak of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV), https://www.who.int/news/item/23-01-2020-statement-on-the-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov) (12.12.2020).

Podobne publikacje