pl

Czy równość płci stanowi jedną z „wartości leżących u podstaw Konwencji” w świetle art. 17 EKPC?

2021, 2021, Numer 4

Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań (Poznań, Poland)


Data publikacji

09.12.2021

Model publikowania

open access

Rodzaj licencji


Dziedzina

Dziedzina nauk społecznych

Dyscyplina

stosunki międzynarodowe, ekonomia i finanse, nauki o komunikacji społecznej i mediach, nauki o polityce i administracji, nauki o zarządzaniu i jakości, nauki prawne, nauki socjologiczne

Język publikacji

Angielski, Polski

Pliki do pobrania

PDF 175 KB

Artykuł

Liczba wyświetleń:318

Liczba pobrań:34

Cytowania Crossref:0

Wynik Altmetric:0


Abstrakt

Celem artykułu jest udzielenie odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy równość płci rzeczywiście stanowi jedną z „wartości leżących u podstaw Konwencji” w świetle art. 17 EKPC. Zbadanie tej kwestii wymaga wzięcia pod uwagę zmienności paradygmatu demokracji walczącej. Autorka stawia hipotezę, że pomimo formalnych deklaracji Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka (ETPC), równość płci, sama w sobie, nie uzasadnia stosowania art. 17 EKPC. Ponadto, ze względu na szkodliwy wpływ art. 17 EKPC na zasadę praworządności, przepis ten nie powinien być stosowany do ochrony równości płci. Artykuł opiera się na analizie orzecznictwa ETPC dotyczącego stosowania art. 17 Konwencji.

Słowa kluczowe:

Bibliografia

ALDEEB Sami (1996), Musulmans en terre européenne. Conflit entre foi et droit, "Pratique juridique actuelle", no 1/1996.

ALKIVIADOU Natalie, MANOLI Andrea (2021), The European Court of Human Rights Through the Looking Glass of Gender: An Evaluation, "Goettingen Journal of International Law", vol. 11, no. 1.

BANTEKAS Ilias, OETTE Lutz (2020), International Human Rights Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612524

BESSON Samantha (2008), Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the Twain Meet?, "Human Rights Law Review", vol. 8 (4), p. 647-682.

https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn023

BRETSCHER Fabienne (2019), Protecting the Religious Freedom of New Minorities in International Law: New York

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264146

BRIBOSIA Emmanuelle, RORIVE Isabelle (2004), Le voile à l'école. Une Europe divisée, "Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme", vol. 2004, no. 60.

CANNIE Hannes, VOORHOOF Dirk (2010), The Abuse Clause in International Human Rights Law: An Expedient Remedy Against Abuse of Power or an Instrument of Abusing Itself, in: Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte, Melanie Lang (eds), Bullying and the Abuse of Power, Oxford

CEDAW - UN General Assembly (1979), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 18 December 1979, A/RES/34/180, https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f2244.html (30.06.2021)

COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2009), Declaration 'Making Gender Equality a Reality', Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 May 2009 at its 119th Session (Madrid).

DE COENSEL Stéphanie (2019), Incitement to terrorism: the nexus between causality and intent and the question of legitimacy: a case study of the European Union, Belgium and the United Kingdom, in: C. Paulussen, M. Scheinin (eds.), Human dignity and human security in times of terrorism, The Hague:

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-355-9_12

DE MORREE Paulien (2016), Rights and wrongs under ECHR. Prohibition of abuse of rights in Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Antwerp

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685427

ECHR (1950), European Convention on Human Rights, i.e. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, opened for signature in Rome on 4 November 1950 and came into force on 3 September 1953.

ECtHR (1961), Lawless v Ireland, Series A no. 3

ECtHR (1968), Belgian Linguistic Case, app. no. 1474/62 and 5 others

ECtHR (1985), Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v the UK, app. no. 9214/80 and 2 others

ECtHR (2001), Dahlab v Switzerland (dec.), app. no. 42393/98

ECtHR (2003), L and V v Austria, app. no. 39392/98 and 39829/98

ECtHR (2004a), Norwood v Iceland (dec.), app. no. 23131/03

ECtHR (2004b), W.P and others v Poland (dec.), app. no. 42264/98

ECtHR (2006), Zarb Adami v Malta, app. no. 17209/02

ECtHR (2009), Opuz v Turkey, app. no 33401/02

ECtHR (2012), Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v the Netherlands, app. no. 58369/10

ECtHR (2013a), Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v Russia, app. no. 26261/05 and 26377/06

ECtHR (2013b), Garcia Mateos v Spain, app. no. 38285/09

ECtHR (2016), di Trizio v Switzerland, app. no. 7186/09

ECtHR (2020), Lilliendahl v Iceland (dec.), app. no. 29297/18

ECtHR (2021a), Jurćic v Croatia, app. no. 54711/1

ECtHR (2021b). Factsheet - Gender Equality, Press Unit; https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/Fs_gender_Equality_ENg.pdf (30.07.2021)

ECtHR (2021c), Guide on Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Prohibition of abuse of rights, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_17_ENG.pdf? (30.04.2021)

ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2003), Refah Partisi v Turkey, app. no. 41340/98 and 3 others

ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2005), Leyla Sahin v Turkey, app. no. 44774/98

ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2012), Konstantin Markin v Russia, app. no. 300078/06

ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2014), S.A.S. v France, app. no. 43835/11

ELVER Hilal (2012), The Haedscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion, Oxford

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769292.001.0001

FADEL Mohammad (2015), A Tale of Two Massacres, in: Edward M. Iacobucci, Stephen J. Toope (eds), After the Paris Attacks: Responses in Canada, Europe and Around the Globe, Toronto.

https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442630024-005

ISSACHAROFF Samuel (2015), Fragile Democracies. Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts, Cambridge

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139839334

JOPPKE Christian (2009), Veil: Mirror of Identity, Cambridge

JOPPKE Christian (2013), Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order, "European Journal of Sociology", 54(1),

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975613000040

JOPPKE Christian (2015), Pluralism vs. Pluralism: Islam and Christianity in the European Court of Human Rights, in: Jean L. Cohen, Cécile Laborde (eds), Religion, Secularism, and Constitutional Democracy, Columbia University Press

https://doi.org/10.7312/cohe16870-005

HARRIS David J., O'BOYLE Michael, BATES Ed P., BUCKLEY Carla M. (2018), Harris, O'Boyle, Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th edition), Oxford.

https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785163.001.0001

HILAL-HARVALD Malthe (2020), Islam as a Civilizational Threat: Constitutional Identity, Militant Democracy and Judicial Review in Western Europe, "German Law Journal", vol. 21 (6), p. 1228-1256.

https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.70

MACKLEM Patrick. (2006), Militant democracy, legal pluralism and the paradox of self-determination, "International Journal of Constitutional Law", vol. 4 (3), p. 488-516.

https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol017

MARSHALL Jill (2015), S.A.S. v France: Burqa Bans and the Control of Empowerment of Identities, "Human Rights Law Review", vol. 15, issue 2.

https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngv003

MAUSSEN Marcel, GRILLO Ralph (2017), Regulation of Speech in Multicultural Societies, New York

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716718

MOWBRAY Alistair (1999), The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the promotion of democracy, Oxford

OETHEIMER Mario (2006), La Cour européenne des droits de l'homme face au discours de haine, "Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme", vol. 2006, no. 69, p. 63-80.

OETHEIMER Mario (ed.) (2007), Freedom of Expression in Europe. Case-Law Concerning Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, "Human rights files", no. 18. Updated edition, March 2007, Council of Europe.

RAINEY Bernadette, McCORMICK Pamela, OVEY Clare (2017), Jacobs, White and Ovey: the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford

https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198767749.001.0001

ROY Olivier (2007), Secularism Confronts Islam, Columbia University Press

SUDRE Frederick (2006), Droit europeen et international des droits de l'homme, Paris

SWEENEY James (2013), The European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era: Universality in Transition, London and New York

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079287

TULKENS Françoise (2005), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tulkens, Annex to the case Leyla Sahin v Turkey, https://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/files/2921/gjo-echr-leyla-sahin-v-turkey-pdf.pdf (10.11.2005)

TULKENS Françoise (2007), Freedom of expression and racism in the case-law of the European Court, in: Expert Seminar: Combating racism while respecting freedom of expression, organized by the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), Strasbourg, 16-17 November 2006, Proceedings, July 2007, https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Proceedings_ECRI_2007.pdf (31.07.2007)

TULKENS Françoise (2012), When to say is to do? Freedom of expression and hate speech in the case-law of European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg presentation, https://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/About%20EJTN/Independent%20Seminars/TULKENS_Francoise_Presentation_When_to_Say_is_To_Do_Freedom_of_Expression_and_Hate_Speech_in_the_Case_Law_of_the_ECtHR_October_2012.pdf (08.10.2012)

UNGUREANU Camil (2012), Europe and Religion: An Ambivalent Nexus, in: Z. Lorenzo, C. Ungureanu, Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas, Cambridge

WICZANOWSKA Hanna (2019), Does ECHR Prohibition of Abuse of Rights Lead to Contradiction of the Principle of Legality? Considerations upon Judicial Practice of ECtHR, "Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego", vol. 6 (52), p. 113-126.

https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2019.06.09

WOODS Lorna (2014), Art. 54 - Prohibition of Abuse of Rights, in: Steve Peers, Tamara K. Hervey, Jeff Kenner, Angela Ward (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Oxford & Portland

Podobne publikacje