Socialisation and decision-making in the Council of the European Union
2015, 2015 (38), No. 4
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 355 KB
Number of views:129
Number of downloads:13
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The complex system of decision-making in the Council of the European Union has many specific features which require explanation. This article presents a constructivist approach to this problem and focuses on the influence of socialisation. First, it explains why inquiry into the decision-making in the Council from the constructivist perspective is justified and then proposes the use of process-tracing, a method that allows to trace causal mechanisms linking the effects of socialisation and the characteristics of decision-making in the Council. Second, a typology of socialisation mechanisms and effects is presented. The third section is an attempt to use the inductive variety of process-tracing in order to explain certain qualities of decision-making in the Council. The final section outlines the theory-oriented approach to process-tracing, which could follow from the presented conceptualisation and explains the need to include the constitutive aspects of socialisation within the causal framework of process-tracing research.
Keywords:
Bibliography
AUS Jonathan P. (2010), The Mechanisms of Consensus: Coming to Agreement onCommunity Asylum Policy, in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling theCouncil of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
BEACH Derek, PEDERSEN Rasmus B. (2013), Process-Tracing Methods: Foundationsand Guidelines, Ann Arbor.
BENNETT Andrew, CHECKEL Jeffrey T. (2012), Process Tracing: From PhilosophicalRoots to Best Practices, “Simons Papers in Security and Development”, no. 21.
BERGER Peter L., LUCKMANN Thomas (1966), The Social Construction of Reality.New York.
BEYERS Jan, DIERICKX Guido (1998), The working groups of the Council of theEuropean Union: supranational or intergovernmental negotiations?, “Journal ofCommon Market Studies”, no. 3.
CHECKEL Jeffrey T. (2005), International Institutions and Socialization in Europe.Introduction and Framework, “International Organization”, no. 4.
CLARK Julian, JONES Alun (2011), “Telling Stories about Politics”: Europeanizationand the EU’s Council Working Groups, “Journal of Common Market Studies”,no. 2.
CROSS James P. (2013), Striking a pose: Transparency and position taking in the Councilof the European Union, “European Journal of Political Research”, no. 3.
GEORGE Alexander L., BENNETT Andrew (2005), Case Studies and Theory Developmentin the Social Sciences, London.
GOLUB Jonathan (2012), How the European Union does not work: national bargainingsuccess in the Council of Ministers, “Journal of European Public Policy”, no. 9.
HÄGE Frank M. (2007), Committee Decision-making in the Council of the EuropeanUnion, “European Union Politics”, no. 3.
HÄGE Frank M. (2008), Who Decides in the Council of the European Union?, “Journalof Common Market Studies”, no. 3.
HÄGE Frank M. (2011), Politicising Council Decision-making. The Effect of EuropeanParliament Empowerment, “West European Politics”, no. 1.
HAGEMANN Sara (2010), Voting, Statements and Coalition-Building in the Councilfrom 1999 to 2006, in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Councilof the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
HAGEMANN Sara, HØYLAND Bjørn (2008), Parties in the Council?, “Journal ofEuropean Public Policy”, no. 8.
HAYES-RENSHAW Fiona, WALLACE Hellen (2006), The Council of Ministers. Basingstoke.
HEISENBERG Dorothee (2005), The institution of “consensus” in the EuropeanUnion: Formal versus informal decision-making in the Council, “European Journalof Political Research”, no. 1.
HØYLAND Bjørn, HANSEN Vibeke W. (2010), Voting in the Consensual Council,http://www.centreurope-montreal.ca/fileadmin/contenu/documents_pdf/20101013_paper.pdf (25.02.2015).
JACKSON Robert, SØRENSEN Georg (2013), Introduction to International Relations.Theories and Approaches, Oxford.
KÖNIG Thomas, JUNGE Dirk (2010), Veto Players Theory and Consensus Behaviour,in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Council of the EuropeanUnion. Games Governments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
ŁAWNICZAK Kamil (2014), Rada Unii Europejskiej. Organizacja i sposób działania,Warszawa.
LEMPP Jakob, ALTENSCHMIDT Janko (2007), Supranationalization through Socializationin the Council of the European Union, http://aei.pitt.edu/7949/01/lempp‐j􀀀‐11b.pdf (25.02.2015).
LEMPP Jakob, ALTENSCHMIDT Janko (2008), The Prevention of Deadlock throughInformal Processes of “Supranationalization”: The Case of Coreper, “Journal ofEuropean Integration”, no. 4.
LEWIS Jeffrey (2003), Institutional Environments And Everyday EU Decision Making:Rationalist or Constructivist?, “Comparative Political Studies”, no. 1–2.
LEWIS Jeffrey (2007), The Janus Face of Brussels. Socialization and Everyday DecisionMaking in the European Union. in: Jeffrey T. Checkel (ed.), InternationalInstitutions and Socialization in Europe, Cambridge.
LEWIS Jeffrey (2010), Strategic Bargaining, Norms, and Deliberation, in: Daniel Naurin,Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Council of the European Union. GamesGovernments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
MATTILA Mikko (2010), Voting and Coalitions in the Council after the Enlargement,in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Council of the EuropeanUnion. Games Governments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
MIKLIN Eric (2009), Government Positions on the EU Services Directive in the Council.National Interests or Individual Ideological Preferences?, “West EuropeanPolitics”, no. 5.
MÜLLER Harald (2004), Arguing, Bargaining and All That. Communicative Action,Rationalist Theory and the Logic of Appropriateness in International Relations,“European Journal of International Relations”, no. 3.
NAURIN Daniel (2009), Most Common When Least Important: Deliberation in theEuropean Union Council of Ministers, “British Journal of Political Science”, no. 1.
NAURIN Daniel, LINDAHL Rutger (2010), East-North-South: Coalition-Building inthe Council Before and After Enlargement, in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds),Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels,Basingstoke.
NIEMANN Arne (2006), Beyond problem-solving and bargaining: genuine debate inEU external trade negotiation, “International Negotiation”, no. 3
NIEMANN Arne (2010), Deliberation and Bargaining in the Article 113 Committeeand the 1996/97 IGC Representatives Group, in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace(eds), Unveiling the Council of the European Union. Games Governments Play inBrussels, Basingstoke.
NOVAK Stéphanie (2012), Transparency versus Accountability? The Case of the
EU Council of Ministers, http://www.transparencyconference.nl/wpcontent/uploads/2012/05/Novak.pdf (25.02.2015).
POLLACK Mark A., SHAFFER Gregory C. (2010), Risk Regulation, GMOs, and theLimits of Deliberation, in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Councilof the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
REH Christine, HÉRITIER Adrienne, BRESSANELLI Edoardo, KOOP Christel(2010), The informal politics of legislation. Explaining secluded decision-makingin the European Union, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/spp/research/esrc-project/Paper_
APSA_2010_Reh_et_al.pdf (25.02.2015).
RISSE Thomas (2009), Social Constructivism and European Integration, in: AntjeWiener, Thomas Diez (eds). European Integration Theory. Oxford.
TALLBERG Jonas (2010), Explaining the institutional foundations of European Unionnegotiations, Journal of European Public Policy, no. 5.
THOMSON Robert (2010), The Relative Power of Member States in the Council: Largeand Small, Old and New, in: Daniel Naurin, Hellen Wallace (eds), Unveiling theCouncil of the European Union. Games Governments Play in Brussels, Basingstoke.
TRONDAL Jarle (2004), Re-Socializing Civil Servants. The Transformative Powers ofEU Institutions, “Acta Politica”, no. 1.
ZÜRN Michael, CHECKEL Jeffrey T. (2005), Getting Socialized to Build Bridges:Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State, “International Organization”,no. 3.
Other articles from the issue
Contents/Spis treści
- information policy of the European Unioninformation policy instrumentsjournalistsin-depth interviews
Information on demand. Evaluation of the European Union’s information policy done by journalists
- European social modelwelfare stateglobalisationageing of the societyneoliberalismthird wayactive social policyeconomic crisis 2008+
The European social model – between crisis and system’s adaptability
Similar publications
Contents/Spis treści
- information policy of the European Unioninformation policy instrumentsjournalistsin-depth interviews
Information on demand. Evaluation of the European Union’s information policy done by journalists
- European social modelwelfare stateglobalisationageing of the societyneoliberalismthird wayactive social policyeconomic crisis 2008+
The European social model – between crisis and system’s adaptability