en
Przegląd Europejski – European Studies Quarterly

The differences between American and European approaches to security policy after the Cold War.

2014, 2014, No. 2

Marek Garlicki

Warsaw University

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.2.14.4

Publication date

28.09.2014

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Social sciences

Discipline

international relations, economics and finance, communication and media studies, political science and public administration, management and quality studies, law, sociology

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 377 KB

Article

Number of views:135

Number of downloads:19

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine whether in the post-Cold War period the European approach to security policy is in fact different than the one of the United States of America, and why it is so. The author tries also to analyse what might be the impact of these differences on the transatlantic relationship and what consequences it might bring in the nearest future. After the description and definition of the term “security”, the author analyses the differences between the two approaches and refers to the arguments and viewpoints of different scholars. In conclusion an attempt to foresee the future of the EU – US security relations is undertaken.<br>Celem artykułu jest zbadanie czy podejścia Unii Europejskiej i Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki do polityki bezpieczeństwa są rzeczywiście różne, jakie są tego powody i co z tego wynika. Oprócz samej charakterystyki obu aktorów stosunków międzynarodowych, jakimi są UE i USA, i analizy ich podejść, autor próbuje ustosunkować się do przytoczonych zdań i poglądów różnych znanych naukowców z dziedziny stosunków międzynarodowych. Zbadanie różnicy w podejściach do polityki bezpieczeństwa jest punktem wyjścia do próby oceny ich wpływu na relacje transatlantyckie i refleksji nad najbliższą przyszłością

Keywords:

European Union,United States of America,security policy,transatlantic relations

Bibliography

AGGESTAM Lisbeth (2008), Introduction: Ethical power Europe?, "International Affairs", nr 84 (1).

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00685.x

AYOOB Mohammed (1995), The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System, Boulder.

BELLANY Ian (1981), Towards a Theory of International Security, "Political Studies", nr 29 (1).

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1981.tb01276.

BRZEZIŃSKI Zbigniew (1997), The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives, New York.

EU-NATO DECLARATION ON ESDP (2002), http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/73803%20-%20Solana%20-%20Permanent%20arrangements%20+%20NATO%20declaration.pdf (21.01.2014).

HAASS Richard (2008), The Age of Nonpolarity, "Foreign Affairs", nr 87 (3).

HOUGH Peter (2004), Understanding Global Security, London.

JACKSON Robert, SØRENSEN Georg (2013), Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches, Oxford.

KAGAN Robert (2003), Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York.

LUCIANI Giacomo (1988), The Economic Content of Security, "Journal of Public Policy", nr 8 (2).

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00006966

MORAVCSIK Andrew (2003), Striking a new transatlantic bargain, "Foreign Affairs", nr 82 (4).

https://doi.org/10.2307/20033650

NYE Joseph (2004), Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics, New York.

REES Wyn (2011), The US-EU Security Relationship: the Tensions between a European and a Global Agenda, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire.

WENDT Alexander (1999), Social theory of international politics, Cambridge.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

Similar publications