Institutional organisation of the European Union in the time of crisis – horizontal division of power and functions
2015, 2015 (38), No. 4
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 282 KB
Number of views:126
Number of downloads:16
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The article poses a question about the existence of the rule of separation of powers in the EU institutional system, as it is suggested by the wording of the treaties. The analysis led to the conclusion, that in the EU institutional system there are three separated functions (powers) assigned to different institutions. The Council and the European Parliament are legislative powers, the Commission and the European Council create a “divided executive”. The Court of Justice is a judicial power. The above mentioned institutions gained strong position within their main functions (legislative, executive, judicial), but the proper mechanisms of checks and balances have not been developed, especially in the relations between legislative and executive power. These powers do not limit one another in the EU system. In the EU there are therefore three separated but arbitrary powers – because they do not limit and balance one another, and are not fully controlled by the member states.
Keywords:
Bibliography
ACKERMAN Bruce (2000), The New Separation of Powers, „Harvard Law Review”,vol. 113, No. 3.
CAROLAN Eoin (2009), The New Separation of Powers: A Theory for the ModernState, New York.
CRAIG Paul (2004), European Governance: Executive and Administrative Powers Under the New Constitutional Settlement, „Jean Monnet Working Paper”, no. 5, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/archive/papers/04/040501-12.pdf.
CURTIN Deirdre (2009), Executive Power of the European Union. Law, Practices, andthe Living Constitution, Oxford.
CURTIN Deirdre (2004), Mind the Gap: the Evolving EU Executive and the Constitution, Groningen, http://www.iuscommune.eu/html/pdf/wvg/wvg3.pdf.
DEHOUSSE Renaud (1998), The European Court of Justice, New York.
GWYN W.B. (1965), The Meaning of the Separation of Powers. An Analysis of theDoctrine from its Origin to the Adoption of the United States Constitution, NewOrleans – The Hague.
HIX Simon (2002), A Constitution for the European Union: A Comparative PoliticalScience Perspective, „Collegium”, no. 23.
HOFMANN Herwig (2009), Legislation, Delegation and Implementation under theTreaty of Lisbon: Typology Meets Reality, „European Law Journal”, vol. 15, no. 4.
MAŁAJNY Ryszard M. (2009), Idea rozdziału władzy państwowej i jej interpretacje,„Przegląd Sejmowy”, nr 1.
MÖLLERS Christoph (2013), The Three Branches. A Comparative Model of Separationof Powers, Oxford.
OLSEN Johan P. (2010), Governing Through Institution Building. Institutional Theoryand Recent Experiments in Democratic Organisation, Oxford.
PUŁŁO Andrzej (1984), O jedno rozumienie podziału władz w nauce prawa konstytucyjnego, „Państwo i Prawo”, z. 6.
SARNECKI Paweł (1995), Współczesne rozumienie podziału władzy, w: Karol B. Janowski (ed.), Nowa konstytucja RP. Wartość, jednostka, instytucje, Toruń.
SCHÜTZE Robert (2011), „Delegated” Legislation in the (new) European Union:A Constitutional Analysis, „Modern Law Review”, vol. 74, no. 5.
STONE SWEET Alec (2011), The European Court of Justice, w: Paul Craig, Grainnede Búrca (eds), The Evolution of EU Law, New York.
TEU, Treaty on European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
TFEU, Treat on the functioning of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
TRIDIMAS Takis (1996), The Court of Justice and Judicial Activism, „European LawReview”, vol. 21, no. 3.
VERHOEVEN Amaryllis (2002), The European Union in Search of a Democratic andConstitutional Theory, The Hague.
VILE M.J.C. (1967), Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers, Oxford.
WRÓBEL Sylwester (1997, ed.), Władza polityczna: koncepcje i ujęcia zjawiska,Katowice.
Other articles from the issue
Contents/Spis treści
- information policy of the European Unioninformation policy instrumentsjournalistsin-depth interviews
Information on demand. Evaluation of the European Union’s information policy done by journalists
- European social modelwelfare stateglobalisationageing of the societyneoliberalismthird wayactive social policyeconomic crisis 2008+
The European social model – between crisis and system’s adaptability
Similar publications
Contents/Spis treści
- information policy of the European Unioninformation policy instrumentsjournalistsin-depth interviews
Information on demand. Evaluation of the European Union’s information policy done by journalists
- European social modelwelfare stateglobalisationageing of the societyneoliberalismthird wayactive social policyeconomic crisis 2008+
The European social model – between crisis and system’s adaptability