en
Przegląd Europejski – European Studies Quarterly

New generation trade agreements as an economic challenge for the European Union and its Member States – the case of CETA

2018, 2018, No. 4

Magdalena Śliwińska

0000-0001-7050-9599

Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Wydział Gospodarki Międzynarodowej, Katedra Europeistyki

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0013.3485

Publication date

06.08.2019

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Social sciences

Discipline

international relations, economics and finance, communication and media studies, political science and public administration, management and quality studies, law, sociology

Language of publication

English, Polish

Downloads

PDF 253 KB

Article

Number of views:304

Number of downloads:61

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The so-called new-generation trade agreements, such as the CETA agreement signed by the EU and Canada, include not only the liberalization of trade in goods and the creation of a free trade area, but also many other areas, such as liberalization of the services market, including public services, mutual recognition of professional qualifications, deregulation and liberalization of financial markets, enhanced cooperation in the protection of intellectual property, and mutual investment protection. The considerations carried out in this work show that the analysis of the consequences of this type of agreements should be carried out not only at the level of the entire EU but also from the perspective of individual member states whose level of economic development and economic structures differ significantly. This is important for proper preparation for the entry into force of such an agreement, creating conditions for the full use of the opportunities arising from it and for adapting to the new market-specific situation and avoiding the greatest possible threats.

Keywords:

new-generation trade agreements,CETA,economic integration,EU,European integration

Bibliography

COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC AND TRADE AGREEMENT (CETA), http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/in-focus/ceta/ (5.11.2016)

COUNCIL OF THE EU (2016), Kompleksowa Umowa Gospodarczo-Handlowa (CETA) między Kanadą, z jednej strony, a Unią Europejską, z drugiej strony, 10973/16, 2016/0206 (NLE).

COUNCIL OF THE EU (2016), 2016/0226 (NLE), http://data.consilium.europa.eu/ doc/document/ST-10973–2016INIT/en/pdf (15.02.2017).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2011), A Trade SIA Relating to the Negotiations of a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada, Trade10/B3/B06, Final Report.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION AND CANADIAN GOVERNMENT (2008), Assessing the costs and benefits of a closer EU-Canada partnership.

FOODWATCH (2016), CETA, TTIP and the EU precautionary principle. Legal analysis of selected parts of the draft CETA agreement and the EU TTIP proposals.

MUSZYŃSKI Marek (2016), CETA – czy jest się czego bać?, http://www.forbes.pl/ ceta-porozumienie-o-wolnym-handlu-z-kanada-grozne-jak-ttip-,artykuly,207870,1,1. html (10.08.2017).

KOHLER Pierre, STORM Servaas (2016), CETA Without Blinders: How Cutting „Trade Costs and More” Will Cause Unemployment, Inequality and Welfare Losses, „Global Development and Environmental Institute Working Paper”, No. 16-03, http://www. ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/wp/16-03CETA.pdf (10.12.2016.).

KONFEDERACJA LEWIATAN (2016), CETA przyniesie korzyści polskim firmom, CEO.COM.PL Biznes w praktyce, https://ceo.com.pl/ceta-przyniesie-korzysci-polskim-firmom-95502, (9.10.2016).

MAZUR Grzegorz (2014), Kompleksowa umowa o współpracy gospodarczej i handlowej – nowy wymiar relacji Unii Europejskiej z Kanadą, „Unia Europejska.pl”, no. 6 (229).

MAZZUCATO Mariana (2014), Przedsiębiorcze państwo, Poznań.

MCKEAGNEY Simon (2016), COMMISSION “NOT IN POSSESSION” of national impact studies for CETA, while US business lobby take study spin to a new height, https://ttip2016.eu/blog/-216.html (10.08.2017).

MINISTRY OF DEVELOPMENT (2016), Analiza gospodarczo-handlowa Całościowego Gospodarczego i Handlowego Porozumienia z Kanadą (CETA) dla polskiej gospodarki i przedsiębiorców – wybrane zagadnienia, Warszawa.

ORĘZIAK Leokadia (2016), Europa nie potrzebuje CETA, „Kultura Liberalna”, http://kulturaliberalna.pl/2016/11/04/leokadia-oreziak-ceta-rozmowa/ (10.02.2017).

WAŚ-TURECKA Agnieszka (2016), Siekierski: CETA przyniesie korzyści polskiemu rolnictwu, http://fakty.interia.pl/raporty/raport-ceta/tylko-w-interii/news-siekierskiceta-przyniesie-korzysci-polskiemu-rolnictwu,nId,2293073 (15.07.2017).

SINCLAIR Scott, TREW Stuart, MERTINS-KIRKWOOD Hadrian (red.) (2014), Making Sense of the CETA – An Analysis of the Final Text of the Canadian- -European Union Comprehensive Economic and trade Agreement, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives,https://www.policyalternatives.ca/sites/default/files/uploads/publications/National%20Office/2014/09/Making_Sense_of_the_CETA.pdf (12.12.20016)

STANOWISKO (2016) Zarządu Krajowej Rady Izb Rolniczych w sprawie Kompleksowej umowy gospodarczo-handlowej (CETA), http://www.krir.pl/files/pisma/ Stanowisko_Zarz%C4%85du_KRIR_ws._CETA_i_TTIP.pdf (10.01.2017)

STIGLITZ Joseph E. (2014), On the Wrong Side of Globalization, https://opinionator. blogs.nytimes.com/2014/03/15/on-the-wrong-side-of-globalization/ (13.01.2017)

Similar publications