The impact of Brexit on the voting power in the Council of the European Union
2018, 2018, No. 4
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 586 KB
Number of views:415
Number of downloads:62
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The article analyses the potential impact of Brexit on the voting power of member states and indirect voting power of EU residents in the Council, in the case of adopting decisions by the qualified majority of votes. The leading hypothesis of the paper assumes that the fact of leaving the EU by Great Britain leads to another transfer of voting power to the benefit of five countries with the largest populations. The aim of the paper is also to determine to what extent the indirect voting power of residents from individual member states is equal. The obtained results indicate that a flow of voting power towards the five member states with the largest populations will be a consequence of Brexit.
Bibliography
ALBERT Max (2003), The Voting Power Approach: Measurement without Theory, “European Union Politics”, vol. 4(3).
ALBERT Max (2004), The voting Power Approach: Unresolved Ambiguities, “European Union Politics”, vol. 5(1).
BALDWIN Richard, WIDGRÉN Mikka (2005), The Impact of Turkey’s Membership on EU Voting, “CEPS Policy Brief “, no. 62.
BANZHAF John F. (1965), Weighted Voting Does Not Work: A Mathematical Analysis, “Rutgers Law Review”, vol. 19(2).
BÂRSAN-PIPU Nicolae, TACHE Ileana (2009), An Analysis of EU Voting Procedures in the Enlargement Context, “International Advances in Economic Research” 2009, vol. 15.
BOBAY Frédéric (2004), Constitution européenee: redistribution du pouvoir des États au Conseil de l’UE, “Économie et Prévision”, no. 163.
COLEMAN James S. (1971), Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act, in: Bernhardt Liberman (ed.), Social Choice, New York.
FELSENTHAL Dan S., MACHOVER Moshé (1998), The Measurement of Voting Power. Theory and Practice, Problems and Paradoxes, Cheltenham.
FELSENTHAL Dan S., MACHOVER Moshé (2004), Analysis of QM rules in the draft constitution for Europe proposed by the European Convention, “Social Choice and Welfare”, vol. 23(1), p. 1-20.
GARRET Geoffrey, TSEBELIS George (1999a), More Reasons to Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the EU, “Journal of Theoretical Politics” 1999, vol. 11(3).
GARRET Geoffrey, TSEBELIS George (1999b), Why Resist the Temptation to Apply Power Indices to the EU, “Journal of Theoretical Politics”, vol. 11(3).
HOSLI Madeleine O. (2008), Council Decision Rules and European Union Constitutional Design, “AUCO Czech Economic Review”, vol. 2(1).
HOSLI Madeleine O., MACHOVER Moshé (2004), The Nice Treaty and Voting Rules in the Council: A Reply to Moberg (2002), “Journal of Common Market Studies”, vol. 42(3).
KIRSCH Werner (2010), The Distribution of Power in the Council of Ministers of the European Union, in: Marek Cichocki, Karol Życzkowski (eds), Institutional Design and Voting Power in the European Union, Farnham.
KIRSCH Werner (2007), On Penrose’s square-root law and beyond, “Homo Oeconomicus”, vol.24(3-4).
KLEINOWSKI Marcin, CZAPUTOWICZ Jacek (2016), Demokratyczność systemów ważenia głosów w Radzie Unii Europejskiej, „Roczniki Nauk Społecznych”, vol.8(3).
LINDNER Ines (2008), The power of a collectivity to act in weighted voting games with many small voters,“Social Choice and Welfare” 2008, vol. 30(4).
MILLER Vaughne, TAYLOR Claire (2008), The Treaty of Lisbon: Amendments to the Treaty on European Union, “House of Commons Research Paper”, no. 09.
MOBERG Axel (2014), The Weight of Nations. Four papers on the institutional negotiations in The EU 1996–2007, Malmö.
NOVAK Stéphanie (2013), The Silence of Ministers: Consensus and Blame Avoidance in the Council of the European Union, “Journal of Common Market Studies”, vol. 51(6).
PENROSE Lionel S. (1946), The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting, “Journal of the Royal Statistical Society”, vol. 109(1).
REGULATION (EU) NO 1260/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 on European demographic statistics, O.J. EU L 330, 10.12.2013.
SHAPLEY L.S., SHUBIK Martin (1954), A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System, “The American Political Science Review”, vol. 48(3).
SOZAŃSKI Tadeusz (2014), The Conception of Blocking Power as a Key to the Understanding of the History of Designing Voting Systems for the EU Council, “Decyzje”, no. 22.
TFUE, Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, O.J. UE C 202, 7.06.2016.
TUE, Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, O.J. UE C 202, 7.06.2016.
Other articles from the issue
Spis treści
- the Economic and Monetary Unionreformsgeo-economicsPoland
The future of the euro area – Poland’s geo-economic perspective
Tomasz Grzegorz Grosse
- democracy crisespolitical alienation between politicians and electoraterise of national populist partiesdecay of democratic regimes in Interwar periodZeitgeist and population’s expectations as driving forces of politicssocial and cultural conditions of a stable democracy
Weak democracies under pressure, 1918 and 1989 in comparison
Dieter Segert
Similar publications
09.12.2021
European UnionEUUnited KingdomBrexitfederationconfederationpolitical systemseconomicsBrexit: a political and economic case study
Iryna Pavlenko, Alfredo Moscardini
29.12.2022
BrexitWithdrawal AgreementmonitoringdisputesMonitoring the implementation and resolving disputes under the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement
Miłosz Gapsa
30.03.2020
European Unionjudicial cooperation in criminal mattersprinciple of mutual recognition of judgmentsEuropean arrest warrantEuropolEurojustBrexit’s impact on judicial cooperation in criminal matters in the European Union
Anastazja Gajda