European Studies Quarterly

Universalism and uniqueness in contemporary soft power strategies

2021, 2021, No. 3

Vladimir G. Ivanov

0000-0002-3650-5460

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.3.21.1

Publication date

25.11.2021

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Social sciences

Discipline

economics and finance, communication and media studies, political science and public administration, management and quality studies, law, sociology, international relations

Language of publication

Polish, English

Downloads

PDF 385 KB

Article

Number of views:271

Number of downloads:53

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

View downloads map

Abstract

The author analyses the principles and regularities of the competition of soft power strategies of different states as an actual problem of comparative politics. The article addresses the question of determining principles and key elements of competing soft power strategies in the system of international relations, which is of current interest in comparative political science. As a methodological foundation of the analysis is used the H. Hotelling’s law of spatial competition and its political implications, formulated by A. Downs. The author examines two contrasting tendencies: drift of the content and strategies of soft power of different states towards unification and convergence of communicated values and standards or on the contrary increase of ideological and value polarization in the wake of escalating international and global tensions. The principles and rules of spatial competition of H. Hotelling and A. Downs have been applied for typology of national strategies of soft power to evaluate their effectiveness and segmentation of potential audience for maximum impact. It was concluded that, due to the polymodality and civilizational diversity of the world, universalist soft-power projects today can only have limited success, with significant costs and reputational losses, while attracting value-close countries and pushing away the others. This division provides the basis for the international clustering by interests and values

Keywords:

Bibliography

APSALONE Madara, ŠUMILO Ērika (2015), Socio-Cultural Factors and International Competitiveness, "Business Management and Education", vol.13(2), p.276-291.

https://doi.org/10.3846/bme.2015.302

BARBER Benjamin R. (1996), Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism's Challenge to Democracy, 1st edition, Ballantine Books.

CHERNENKO Elena (2015), What is Written Cannot be Undone?, "Russia in Global Affairs", no. 1.

DE MARTINO Mario (2020), Soft power: Theoretical framework and political foundations, "Przegląd Europejski", no. 4/2020, p.11-24.

https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.4.20.1

DOWNS Anthony (1957), An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York.

DRAGACHEVA Olga S. (2006), Foreign policy image of the state and its leader: Technologies of formation and positioning, Moscow.

GLOBAL SOFT POWER INDEX 2020 (2020), Brand Finance, https://brandirectory.com/globalsoftpower/download/brand-finance-global-soft-power-index-2020.pdf (11.01.2021).

GURR Thomas (1970), Why Men Rebel, Princeton University Press.

HOTELLING Harold (1929), Stability in Competition, "The Economic Journal", vol. 39, no. 153, March.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214

ISLAM Lamia (2021), Relative Deprivation and the Sustainable Development Goals, in: Filho W. LEAL et al. (eds), Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, Springer, Cham.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71066-2_142-1

IVANOV Oleg B. (2019), "Soft power" as a catalyst of socio-political conflicts, "RUDN Journal of Public Administration", vol. 6, no. 3, p. 167-176;

https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-3-167-176

IVANOV Vladimir G. (2015), "Charts power" - international ratings as a tool of soft power and an economic weapon: The technologies of application and the strategies of counteraction, Moscow: INFRA-M.

KOSACHEV Konstantin (2012), The specifics of Russian soft power, "Russia in Global Affairs", в„–3, July/September 2012, https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/the-specifics-of-russian-soft-power/ (07.10.2012)

KOUMA Jean (2019), Russian Cultural Marking of the International Scene: The Soft Power to the Test (2000-2018), "RUDN Journal of Public Administration", vol. 6, no. 4, p.356-365. ttps://

https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2019-6-4-356-365

LEONOVA Olga (2014), "Soft power": the tools and the influence coefficients, "Obozrevatel-Observer", no. 3 (290).

LEONOVA Olga (2015), Approaches to the analysis of "soft power" in the Russian political science, "Obozrevatel-Observer", no. 2 (301).

NOYA Javier (2005), El Poder Simbólico De Las Naciones, "Documento de Trabajo", no. 35/2005, http://www.ddooss.org/articulos/otros/NoyaPoderSimbolico.pdf (11.01.2021).

PARSHIN Pavel (2015), Adventures of Soft Power in the World of Communication Technologies, in: E.G. Borisov (ed.), Soft power. Interdisciplinary analysis, Moscow.

PRESTOWITZ Clyde (2005), Rogue Nation - American Unilateralism and The Failure of Good Intentions, St. Petersburg: Amphora.

RIVAS Cesar V. (2010), Cosmopolitan Constructivism: Mapping a Road to the Future of Cultural and Public Diplomacy?, "Public diplomacy magazine", Winter 2010, http://publicdiplomacymagazine.com/cosmopolitan-constructivism-mapping-a-road-to-the-future-of-cultural-and-publicdiplomacy/ (27.03.2017).

VASILENKO Irina et al. (2013), Russia's image strategy in the context of world experience, Moscow: International relations. The Soft Power 30 (WWW), https://softpower30.com/ (11.01.2021).

Similar publications