Does gender equality constitute one of the ‘underlying values of the ECHR’ in the light of Article 17 ECHR?
2021, 2021, No. 4
Adam Mickiewicz University of Poznań (Poznań, Poland)
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 175 KB
Number of views:318
Number of downloads:34
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The main aim of this article is to answer the question whether gender equality actually constitutes one of the “underlying values of the ECHR” through the lens of Article 17 ECHR. Examining this issue requires taking into account the changing paradigm of militant democracy. The hypothesis posed by the author is that, despite the formal declarations of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), gender equality does not alone justify the application of abuse clause. Moreover, this research claims that, due to its adverse impact on the rule of law principle, Article 17 ECHR is not an appropriate remedy to protect gender equality. The research relies on the analysis of the relevant ECtHR’s rulings on Article 17 ECHR.<br>The main aim of this article is to answer the question whether gender equality actually constitutes one of the “underlying values of the ECHR” through the lens of Article 17 ECHR. Examining this issue requires taking into account the changing paradigm of militant democracy. The hypothesis posed by the author is that, despite the formal declarations of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), gender equality does not alone justify the application of abuse clause. Moreover, this research claims that, due to its adverse impact on the rule of law principle, Article 17 ECHR is not an appropriate remedy to protect gender equality. The research relies on the analysis of the relevant ECtHR’s rulings on Article 17 ECHR.
Keywords:
Bibliography
ALDEEB Sami (1996), Musulmans en terre européenne. Conflit entre foi et droit, "Pratique juridique actuelle", no 1/1996.
ALKIVIADOU Natalie, MANOLI Andrea (2021), The European Court of Human Rights Through the Looking Glass of Gender: An Evaluation, "Goettingen Journal of International Law", vol. 11, no. 1.
BANTEKAS Ilias, OETTE Lutz (2020), International Human Rights Law and Practice, 3rd edition, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108612524
BESSON Samantha (2008), Gender Discrimination under EU and ECHR Law: Never Shall the Twain Meet?, "Human Rights Law Review", vol. 8 (4), p. 647-682.
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngn023
BRETSCHER Fabienne (2019), Protecting the Religious Freedom of New Minorities in International Law: New York
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264146
BRIBOSIA Emmanuelle, RORIVE Isabelle (2004), Le voile à l'école. Une Europe divisée, "Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme", vol. 2004, no. 60.
CANNIE Hannes, VOORHOOF Dirk (2010), The Abuse Clause in International Human Rights Law: An Expedient Remedy Against Abuse of Power or an Instrument of Abusing Itself, in: Kristof K. P. Vanhoutte, Melanie Lang (eds), Bullying and the Abuse of Power, Oxford
CEDAW - UN General Assembly (1979), Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 18 December 1979, A/RES/34/180, https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f2244.html (30.06.2021)
COUNCIL OF EUROPE (2009), Declaration 'Making Gender Equality a Reality', Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 12 May 2009 at its 119th Session (Madrid).
DE COENSEL Stéphanie (2019), Incitement to terrorism: the nexus between causality and intent and the question of legitimacy: a case study of the European Union, Belgium and the United Kingdom, in: C. Paulussen, M. Scheinin (eds.), Human dignity and human security in times of terrorism, The Hague:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-355-9_12
DE MORREE Paulien (2016), Rights and wrongs under ECHR. Prohibition of abuse of rights in Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Antwerp
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685427
ECHR (1950), European Convention on Human Rights, i.e. The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, opened for signature in Rome on 4 November 1950 and came into force on 3 September 1953.
ECtHR (1961), Lawless v Ireland, Series A no. 3
ECtHR (1968), Belgian Linguistic Case, app. no. 1474/62 and 5 others
ECtHR (1985), Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v the UK, app. no. 9214/80 and 2 others
ECtHR (2001), Dahlab v Switzerland (dec.), app. no. 42393/98
ECtHR (2003), L and V v Austria, app. no. 39392/98 and 39829/98
ECtHR (2004a), Norwood v Iceland (dec.), app. no. 23131/03
ECtHR (2004b), W.P and others v Poland (dec.), app. no. 42264/98
ECtHR (2006), Zarb Adami v Malta, app. no. 17209/02
ECtHR (2009), Opuz v Turkey, app. no 33401/02
ECtHR (2012), Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij v the Netherlands, app. no. 58369/10
ECtHR (2013a), Kasymakhunov and Saybatalov v Russia, app. no. 26261/05 and 26377/06
ECtHR (2013b), Garcia Mateos v Spain, app. no. 38285/09
ECtHR (2016), di Trizio v Switzerland, app. no. 7186/09
ECtHR (2020), Lilliendahl v Iceland (dec.), app. no. 29297/18
ECtHR (2021a), Jurćic v Croatia, app. no. 54711/1
ECtHR (2021b). Factsheet - Gender Equality, Press Unit; https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/Fs_gender_Equality_ENg.pdf (30.07.2021)
ECtHR (2021c), Guide on Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Prohibition of abuse of rights, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_17_ENG.pdf? (30.04.2021)
ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2003), Refah Partisi v Turkey, app. no. 41340/98 and 3 others
ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2005), Leyla Sahin v Turkey, app. no. 44774/98
ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2012), Konstantin Markin v Russia, app. no. 300078/06
ECtHR GRAND CHAMBER (2014), S.A.S. v France, app. no. 43835/11
ELVER Hilal (2012), The Haedscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion, Oxford
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199769292.001.0001
FADEL Mohammad (2015), A Tale of Two Massacres, in: Edward M. Iacobucci, Stephen J. Toope (eds), After the Paris Attacks: Responses in Canada, Europe and Around the Globe, Toronto.
https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442630024-005
ISSACHAROFF Samuel (2015), Fragile Democracies. Contested Power in the Era of Constitutional Courts, Cambridge
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139839334
JOPPKE Christian (2009), Veil: Mirror of Identity, Cambridge
JOPPKE Christian (2013), Double Standards? Veils and Crucifixes in the European Legal Order, "European Journal of Sociology", 54(1),
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975613000040
JOPPKE Christian (2015), Pluralism vs. Pluralism: Islam and Christianity in the European Court of Human Rights, in: Jean L. Cohen, Cécile Laborde (eds), Religion, Secularism, and Constitutional Democracy, Columbia University Press
https://doi.org/10.7312/cohe16870-005
HARRIS David J., O'BOYLE Michael, BATES Ed P., BUCKLEY Carla M. (2018), Harris, O'Boyle, Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th edition), Oxford.
https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785163.001.0001
HILAL-HARVALD Malthe (2020), Islam as a Civilizational Threat: Constitutional Identity, Militant Democracy and Judicial Review in Western Europe, "German Law Journal", vol. 21 (6), p. 1228-1256.
https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2020.70
MACKLEM Patrick. (2006), Militant democracy, legal pluralism and the paradox of self-determination, "International Journal of Constitutional Law", vol. 4 (3), p. 488-516.
https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mol017
MARSHALL Jill (2015), S.A.S. v France: Burqa Bans and the Control of Empowerment of Identities, "Human Rights Law Review", vol. 15, issue 2.
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngv003
MAUSSEN Marcel, GRILLO Ralph (2017), Regulation of Speech in Multicultural Societies, New York
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716718
MOWBRAY Alistair (1999), The role of the European Court of Human Rights in the promotion of democracy, Oxford
OETHEIMER Mario (2006), La Cour européenne des droits de l'homme face au discours de haine, "Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme", vol. 2006, no. 69, p. 63-80.
OETHEIMER Mario (ed.) (2007), Freedom of Expression in Europe. Case-Law Concerning Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, "Human rights files", no. 18. Updated edition, March 2007, Council of Europe.
RAINEY Bernadette, McCORMICK Pamela, OVEY Clare (2017), Jacobs, White and Ovey: the European Convention on Human Rights, Oxford
https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198767749.001.0001
ROY Olivier (2007), Secularism Confronts Islam, Columbia University Press
SUDRE Frederick (2006), Droit europeen et international des droits de l'homme, Paris
SWEENEY James (2013), The European Court of Human Rights in the Post-Cold War Era: Universality in Transition, London and New York
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203079287
TULKENS Françoise (2005), Dissenting Opinion of Judge Tulkens, Annex to the case Leyla Sahin v Turkey, https://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/files/2921/gjo-echr-leyla-sahin-v-turkey-pdf.pdf (10.11.2005)
TULKENS Françoise (2007), Freedom of expression and racism in the case-law of the European Court, in: Expert Seminar: Combating racism while respecting freedom of expression, organized by the European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI), Strasbourg, 16-17 November 2006, Proceedings, July 2007, https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Proceedings_ECRI_2007.pdf (31.07.2007)
TULKENS Françoise (2012), When to say is to do? Freedom of expression and hate speech in the case-law of European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg presentation, https://www.ejtn.eu/Documents/About%20EJTN/Independent%20Seminars/TULKENS_Francoise_Presentation_When_to_Say_is_To_Do_Freedom_of_Expression_and_Hate_Speech_in_the_Case_Law_of_the_ECtHR_October_2012.pdf (08.10.2012)
UNGUREANU Camil (2012), Europe and Religion: An Ambivalent Nexus, in: Z. Lorenzo, C. Ungureanu, Law, State and Religion in the New Europe: Debates and Dilemmas, Cambridge
WICZANOWSKA Hanna (2019), Does ECHR Prohibition of Abuse of Rights Lead to Contradiction of the Principle of Legality? Considerations upon Judicial Practice of ECtHR, "Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego", vol. 6 (52), p. 113-126.
https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2019.06.09
WOODS Lorna (2014), Art. 54 - Prohibition of Abuse of Rights, in: Steve Peers, Tamara K. Hervey, Jeff Kenner, Angela Ward (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Oxford & Portland
Other articles from the issue
- e-democracye-governmente-participationcitizen participation
Analytical framework for researching citizen participation in the era of e-democracy
Izabela Kapsa
- New Green Political TheoryEuropean UnionCOVID-19ecocentrismecopoliticssustainable developmentpro-environmentalism
Genesis of the COVID-19 pandemic. An attempt at analysis based on the New Green Political Theory
Janusz Ruszkowski, Marek Żurek
- organized crimeCouncil of Europespecial investigative measuresmodern approachcriminal investigationcooperation
The necessity of a modern approach to criminal investigation of organized crime
Azra Jamaković
Similar publications
09.12.2021
gender equalityconstitutional lawhuman rightsKeynote speech on the International Conference on Comparative Legal Review and the Judicial Protection of Gender Equality, 4-5 March 2021
Adrienne Stone
09.12.2021
double marginalisationCOVID-19 pandemicgender equalitylabour marketKosovoeconomic empowermentexclusionThe impact of COVID-19 pandemic on double marginalisation of women in Kosovo
Judita Krasniqi, Labinot Hajdari
30.12.2025
gender equalityEuropean Union (EU)Türkiyenew social movementsactivismintersectionalityhuman rightsGender equality in motion: the transformative power of new social movements in the EU and Türkiye
Susran Erkan Eroglu, Tetiana Drakokhrust