Organisation of the innovative labour and the innovation process at the modern European enterprise
2022, 2022, No. 2
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (Kharkiv, Ukraine)
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 612 KB
Number of views:155
Number of downloads:79
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The innovative work of managerial specialists includes the organisation of the labour resilience of workers. The aim of this article is theoretical substantiation of the approach to the organisation of the innovative labour and innovation process at the modern European enterprise. Methods used in this research: morphological analysis, comparative analysis of literature sources, logical generalisation, analysis and synthesis. New interpretation of the essence of the category "organisation of the innovative labour of managerial specialists" is proposed in this article. The classification of stages and steps of the innovative labour and innovation process has been improved in presented research. The approach to the organisation of the innovative labour and innovation process at the enterprise in modern conditions has been substantiated, in particular, the content of individual stages of the innovation process. The sequence of choosing a model for organising the innovation process is determined. It has been substantiated that under the influence of high uncertainty of the environment, it is necessary to use linear form and linear feedback form of the organisation of the innovation process.
Keywords:
Bibliography
BEKLESHOV Vadim K., ZAVLIN Pavel N. (1989), Normirovanie v nauchno-tekhnicheskikh organizatsiâkh, Moskva.
ERMOSHENKO Mykola, GANUSHCHAK–EFIMENKO Liudmyla (2011), Ekonomika ta upravlinnia innovatsiĭnoiu diâl’nistiu, Kyiv.
FEDORENKO Valentyn, FEDULOVA Liubov (2014), Upravlinnia innovatsijnym rozvytkom pidpryemstva, Kyiv.
ILLIASHENKO Serhij (ed.) (2015), Rynkovo-orientovane upravlinnia innovatsiĭnym rozvytkom, Kharkiv.
KIRYAN Tetiana M., SHAPOVAL Mykola S. (2011), Teoretyko-metodolohichni polozhennia shchodo sotsial’noї orghanizaciї praci, „Visnyk ekonomichnoї nauky Ukraїny”, no. 1 (19).
KARPYUK Oleksandr P. (2015), Rehuliuvannia innovatsiĭnykh protsesiv v ekonomitsi, Kyiv.
KOLOT Anatoliy M., HERASYMENKO Oksana O. (2018), Innovative labour and its intellectualization as strategic vectors of the formation of the new economy, „Economics and organization of management”, no. 1 (29).
KOLOT Anatoliy (2007), Innovatsijna pratsia ta intelektual’nyj kapital u systemi faktoriv formuvannia ekonomiky znan’, „Ekonomichna teoria”, no. 2.
LUENENDONK Martin (2019), The Innovation Process: Definition, Models, Tips, „Cleverism”, https:// www.cleverism.com/innovation-process-definition-models-tips/ (23.09.2019)
RADIONOVA Natalija (2010), Organizatsiĭno-ekonomichne zabezpechennia upravlinnia innovatsiĭnym rozvytkom mashynobudivnoho pidpryemstva, avtoref. dys. kand. ekon. nauk, Lugansk.
ROTHWELL Roy (1993), The Changing Nature of the Innovation Process, “Technovation”, vol. 13, no. 8.
ROTHWELL Roy (1994), The changing nature of the innovation process: implications for SMEs, in: R. Oakey (ed.), New Technology Based Firms in the 1990s, London.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(93)90009-K
VASYLENKO Valeriy N., ZAYTSEV Vitaliy S. (2014), Organizatsiâ truda stanochnikov: teoriâ i praktika povysheniâ effektivnosti, Donetsk.
VASHCHENKO Oleksandr P. (2017), Teoriâ ta praktyka pobudovy orghanizatsiĭnykh system upravlinnia, Kyiv.
VITVITSKY Volodymyr et al. (2007), Metodyka rozrobky norm chasu na naukovo-doslidni roboty ustanov produktyvnosti APK, Kyiv.
ZAYTSEV Vitaliy S. (2013), Pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti orghanizatsiї praci verstatnykiv na mashyno-budivnomu pidpryemstvi, avtoref. dys. kand. ekon. nauk, Donetsk.
ZVYAGIN Aleksey, ZVYAGINA Natalia (1991), Kompleksnyĭ podhod k metodam razrabotki normativov trudoemkosti NIOKR, Moskva.
Other articles from the issue
- Science diplomacyCOVID-19 pandemicthe European UnionEU
Science diplomacy of the European Union in the time of COVID-19 pandemic
Monika Szkarłat
- European UnionEULGBTpartnershipssame-sex marriageunity in diversity
Unity in diversity and the EU Member States’ regulations on the rights of the LGBT people
Katarzyna Zawadzka
- BrazilEuropean UnionEUdevelopment policyaid programsdevelopment programsEU external relationsEU partnership with the third countries
The efficiency of the European Union’s development aid provided to Brazil in the context of historical, socio-economic, and political conditions of mutual relations
Izabela Sara Opozda