en

Assessment of legal solutions to facilitate work-life balance in the public services sector

2022, 2022, No. 3

University of Warsaw (Warsaw, Poland)


Publication date

29.12.2022

Publishing model

open access

License type


Field

Social sciences

Discipline

international relations, economics and finance, communication and media studies, political science and public administration, management and quality studies, law, sociology

Language of publication

Polish, English

Downloads

PDF 174 KB

Article

Number of views:227

Number of downloads:93

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0


Abstract

The aim of this study is to present chosen aspects of assessing legal solutions facilitating reconciliation of work and private life for employees of the public services sector, based on empirical research conducted in five European countries. The research purpose was to indicate the role of labour law regulations in shaping the work-life balance and to determine the ways of their implementation, their usefulness and the needs that emerge in the changing socio-economic reality, as evidenced by the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The need to isolate people quickly popularised remote (online) work and the possibility of staying at home, which possibly had a positive impact on private matters. However, the general situation is different. Hence, the hypothesis was adopted that despite the variety of solutions, they are insufficiently used in the public services sector. Although there are noticeable facilitations in combining professional and family duties, they still have too little impact on the attractiveness of work and are not of an innovative nature. The specificity of the public services sector makes it difficult to freely choose solutions that increase the flexibility of employment and thus the activity of working parents, especially women on the labour market.

Keywords:

Bibliography

BORKOWSKA Stanisława (2010), Równowaga między pracą a życiem pozazawodowym, „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica”, vol. 240.

CROMPTON Rosemary, LYONETTE Clare (2005), Work-life “balance” in Europe, “Acta Sociologica”, vol. 49, issue 4.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699306071680

DIRECTIVE (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU, OJ L 188, 12.07.2019.

FAGAN Colette (2004), Gender and working time in industrialized countries, in: Messenger Jon C. (ed.), Working time and workers’ preferences in industrialized countries: finding the balance, London.

JOSHI Sunil, LEICHNE John, MELANSON Keith, PRUNA Cristina, SAGER Nicolai, STORY Cathi Jo, WILLIAMS Kevin (2002), Work-life balance: A case of social responsibility or competitive advantage?, Atlanta.

KINMAN Gail, McDOWALL Almuth (2009), Does work-life balance depended on where and how you work?, “European Work and Organizational Psychology in Practice”, issue 3/2009.

KOŁODKO Grzegorz W. (2017), Jak zniszczyć kraj. Ekonomia i polityka greckiego kryzysu, „Ekonomista”, no. 2.

LOCKWOOD Nancy R. (2003), Work/Life Balance: Challenges and Solution, “Research Quarterly”, no 2.

McPHERSON Mervyl (2006), The role of managers in work-life balance implementation, “Labour, Employment and Work in New Zealand”, vol. 2006,

https://doi.org/10.26686/lew.v0i0.1312

PANGSY-KANIA Sylwia, SZCZODROWSKI Grzegorz (eds) (2009), Gospodarka polska po 20 latach transformacji. Osiągnięcia, problemy i wyzwania, Warszawa.

PEŠIĆ Jelena (2017), Promena vrednosnih orijentacija u postsocijalističkim društvima Srbije i Hrvatske: politički i ekonomski liberalizam, Beograd.

SADOWSKA-SNARSKA Cecylia (2008), Rozwiązania wspierające równowagę między życiem zawodowym i osobistym, Białystok.

STACEWICZ Janusz (ed.) (2017), Perspektywy polityki gospodarczej, Warszawa.

STIGLITZ Joseph E. (2010), Ekonomia sektora publicznego, Warszawa.

STOLEROFF Alan (2013), Employment relations and unions in public administration in Portugal and Spain: From reform to austerity, “European Journal of Industrial Relations”, vol. 19, issue 4.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113505033