Dynamics and determinants of Russia’s geoeconomic strength in relation to the Central and Eastern European region
2022, 2022, No. 4
Poznan University of Economics and Business (Poznań, Poland)
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 2 MB
Number of views:246
Number of downloads:85
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The aim of the article is to examine the dynamics and the determinants of the geoeconomic strength of Russia in relation to Central and Eastern European countries (CEE-11) belonging to the European Union. The article confirms the research hypotheses that: (i) since 2014, the geoeconomic balance of power in Central and Eastern Europe began to change significantly in favor of the CEE-11 region, (ii) the economic sanctions imposed on Russia after 2014 negatively influenced its geoeconomic strength in relation to the CEE-11 region by reducing the export and import flows, as well as FDI net inflows in Russia compared to the CEE-11 countries. Panel regression analysis (ordinary least squares and fully modified ordinary least squares) was used to test the second hypothesis. All data used in the article comes from the World Bank database and covers the period from 2004 to 2020.
Keywords:
Bibliography
ABRAMOVITZ Moses (1986), Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind, “Journal of Economic History”, vol. 46, no. 2.
ACEMOGLU Daron, ROBINSON James (2010), The Role of Institutions in Growth and Development, in: David Brady, Michael Spence (eds), Leadership and Growth, World Bank Publications.
BARRO Robert J. (1991), Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, No. 106.
BLACKWILL Robert D., HARRIS Jennifer M. (2016), War by Other Means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft, April 2016, Harvard University Press.
BOZKURT Özlem Gül, ERDEM Cumhur, EROĞLU İlhan (2015), Identifying the factors affecting the economic growth of oil-producing countries, “Int. J. Trade and Global Markets”, vol. 8, no. 2.
BRADSHAW Michael J., CONNOLLY Richard (2016), Russia’s natural resources in the world economy: history, review and reassessment, “Eurasian Geography and Economics”, vol. 57, issue 6,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1254055
CHOI In (2001), Unit Root Tests for Panel Data, “Journal of International Money and Finance”, vol. 20, issue 2.
COTTON Linda, RAMACHANDRAN Vijaya (2001), Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Economies, Lessons from sub-Saharan Africa, Discussion Paper No. 2001/82, United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research.
DOMAR Evsey David (1947), Expansion and Employment, “American Economic Review”, vol. 37.
EICHENGREEN Barry (2008), The Real Exchange Rate and Economic Growth, “Commission on Growth and Development Working Paper”, no. 4, World Bank, Washington, DC.
GELB Leslie H. (1991), GDP Now Matters More Than Force: A U.S. Foreign Policy for the Age of Economic Power, “Foreign Affairs”, vol. 89, no. 6. https://www. foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2010-10-21/gdp-nowmatters-more-force (21.10.2010).
GROSSMAN Gene M., HELPMAN Elhanan (1991), Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, MIT Press, Cambridge.
HALIŻAK Edward (2012), O istocie geoekonomicznego działania, in: Edward Haliżak (ed.), Geoekonomia, Warszawa.
HALL Robert E., JONES Charles I. (1997), Levels of Economic Activity across Countries, “American Economic Review”, vol. 87(2).
HARROD Roy F. (1939), An Essay in Dynamic Theory, “The Economic Journal”, vol. 49, no. 193.
HAVLIK Peter (2014), Economic Consequences of the Ukraine Conflict, “Policy Notes and Reports”, no. 14, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, https://wiiw.ac.at/economic-consequences-of-the-ukraine-conflict-dlp-3427.pdf (30.11.2014).
HAVRANEK Tomas, HORVATH Roman, ZEYNALOV Ayaz (2016), Natural Resources and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis, “World Development”, vol. 88,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.07.016
LI Xiaoying, LIU Xiaming (2005), Foreign direct investment and economic growth: an increasingly endogenous relationship, “World Development”, vol. 33,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.11.001
LUCAS Robert E. (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, “Journal of Monetary Economics”, vol. 22.
MADDALA G. S., WU Shaowen (1999), A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and new simple test, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 61, issue S1.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631
OLSEN Kim B. (2022), The Geoeconomic Diplomacy of European Sanctions, Leiden, The Netherlands.
PEDRONI Peter (1999), Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors, “Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 61, issue 51,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
PEDRONI Peter (2000), Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels, “Department of Economics Working Papers”, no. 2000-03, Department of Economics, Williams College.
PEDRONI Peter (2004), Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis, “Econometric Theory”, vol. 20, issue 3,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
PORTELA Clara (2021), The EU and the strategic use of sanctions as a geo-economic tool, https://www.boell.de/en/2021/02/03/eu-and-strategic-use-sanctions-geo-economic-tool (03.02.2021).
ROMER Paul M. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, “Journal of Political Economy”, vol. 94, no 5.
ŚLIWIŃSKI Paweł (2011), Przepływy kapitału międzynarodowego a wzrost gospodarczy w krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej w latach 1994–2008, Poznań.
SOLOW Robert Merton (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, “Quarterly Journal of Economics”, vol. 70
SRINIVASAN T. N., BHAGWATI Jagdish (1999), Outwar-Orientation and Development: Are Revisionists Right?, “Center Discussion Paper”, no. 806, Yale University, Economic Growth Center.
https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.28476
SWAN Trevor W. (1956), Economic Growth and Capital Accumulation, “Economic Record”, vol. 32.
Other articles from the issue
- sustainable developmentsocial innovationEuropean UnionEUgender gapgender equality
Gender equality and innovation – towards sustainable development and social innovation using the example of activities undertaken by the European Union
Leszek Kwieciński
- State Aid for R&Dresearch and developmentPolandEuropean Union
Evolution of R&D state aid in Poland in the context of Multiannual Financial Perspectives
Adam A. Ambroziak, Beata Grzegorzewska, Aleksandra Kopeć
- crisisEurozonefinancial fragilityriskstabilitybanking sector
Multidimensional analysis of the banking sector stability in the Eurozone countries. Effects in the context of risk
Jacek Pera
Similar publications
09.12.2021
Europeelectronic votingYouTubepublic opinionpolitical newssocial mediaelectionsBelgiumEstoniaSwitzerlandRussiaPublic opinion about electronic voting in Europe as illustrated by YouTube
Vladislav Fedorov
08.09.2021
Russianation-buildinghistorical policythe ConstitutionThe question of national unity in contemporary Russia: is a single national myth possible?
Artem Barynkin
05.05.2022
COVID-19coronaviruspandemicUSAChinaEuropean UnionEURussiageopolitical competitionGeopolitical competition of global powers during the COVID-19 pandemic
Diana Mykhailova-Kacimi