Radical right-wing Eurosceptics as public orators in the European Parliament: the logic of persuasion as an instrument to break consensus
2023, 2023, No. 4
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Abstract
The aim of this article is to examine how members of the political group Identity and Democracy (I&D) attempt to break the existing pro-Ukrainian consensus in the European Parliament (EP). The adopted hypothesis is that I&D MEPs do that through the mechanism of the logic of persuasion. It was verified by analysing speeches during EP plenary debates on the situation in Ukraine and looking for evidence of this mechanism within them. The analysis demonstrated that almost 1/4 of the I&D political group uses the logic of persuasion in all their speeches to break the pro-Ukrainian consensus in the EP, but only six MEPs are likely to do that intentionally. However, some of the analysed MEPs use this mechanism in their speeches to undermine the consensus on migration and asylum policy.
Keywords:
Bibliography
BRACK Nathalie (2015), The roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and their implications for the EU, “International Political Science Review”, vol. 36, issue 3, DOI: 10.1177/0192512115571590
CHECKEL Jeffrey T. (2001), Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change, “International Organization”, vol. 55(3).
CHECKEL Jeffrey T., MORAVCSIK Andrew (2001), A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies?, “European Union Politics”, vol. 2, issue 2. DOI: 10.1177/1465116501002002004
DATTA Neil (2022), We know Russia funds Europe’s far Right. But what does it get in return?, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/5050/russia-ukraine-war-putin-europe-far-right-funding-conservatives/ (6.04.2022).
DALTON Matthew (2022), Marine Le Pen’s Far-Right French Party to Pay Nearly $13 Million to Russian Military Contractor. “The Wall Street Journal”, https://www.wsj.com/articles/marine-le-pens-far-right-french-party-to-pay-nearly-13-million-to-russian-military-contractor-11650644840 (11.05.2023).
FUTÀK-CAMPBELL Beatrix (2020), Political Synergy: How the European Far-Right and Russia Have Joined Forces Against Brussels, “Atlantisch Perspectief”, vol. 44(1).
HABERMAS Jürgen (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston.
HAINSWORTH Paul (2008), The Extreme Right in Western Europe. The Making of the Contemporary World, Abingdon.
IVALDI Giles, ZANKINA Emila (eds) (2023), The Impacts of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine on Right-wing Populism in Europe, Brussels.
JORGENSEN Charlotte, KOCK Christian, RORBECH Lone (1998), Rhetoric That Shifts Votes: An Exploratory Study of Persuasion in Issue-Oriented Public Debates, “Political Communication”, vol. 15(3).
KEITH Dan (2017), Stop TTIP’: towards a transnational Eurosceptic opposing the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership?, in: John Fitzgibbon, Benjamin Leruth, Nick Startin (eds), Euroscepticism as a Transnational and Pan-European Phenomenon. The Emergence of a New Sphere of Opposition, Abingdon.
MINKENBERG Michael, PERRINEAU Pascal (2007), The Radical Right in the European Elections 2004, “International Political Science Review”, vol. 28, no. 1.
MORLEY Thomas, SOULA Etienne (2019), Caught Red Handed: Russian Financing Scheme in Italy Highlights Europe’s Vulnerabilities, https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/latest-russian-financing-scheme-in-italy-highlights-europes-vulnerabilities/ (12.07.2019).
MUTZ Diana, SNIDERMAN Paul, BRODY Richard (eds) (1996), Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, Ann Arbor.
MÜLLER Patrick, POMORSKA Karolina, TONRA Ben (2021), The Domestic Challenge to EU Foreign Policy-Making: From Europeanisation to de-Europeanisation?, “Journal of European Integration”, vol. 43(5).
PARDO Sharon, GORDON Neve (2018), Euroscepticism as an Instrument of Foreign Policy, “Middle East Critique”, vol. 27(4).
POLYAKOVA Alina (2014), Strange Bedfellows: Putin and Europe’s Far Right. “World Affairs”, vol. 177(3).
STEINER Nils D., BERLINSCHI Ruxanda, FARVAQUE Etienne, FIDRMUC Jan, HARMS Philipp, MIHAILOV Alexander, NEUGART Michael, STANEK Piotr (2023), Rallying around the EU flag: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and attitudes toward European integration, “Journal of Common Market Studies”, vol. 61, issue 2. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13449
STOCKEMER Daniel, NIEMANN Arne, RABENSCHLAG Johannes, SPEYER Johanna, UNGER Doris (2018), Immigration, anti-immigrant attitudes and Eurosceptism: a meta-analysis, “French Politics”, vol.16. DOI: 10.1057/s41253-018-0065-x
SZCZERBIAK Aleks, TAGGART Paul (2018), Contemporary research on Euroscepticism: The state of the art, in: Benjamin Leruth, Nicholas Startin, Simon Usherwood (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism, Abingdon.
TERESZKIEWICZ Filip (2015), Partie antyunijne wobec konfliktu na Ukrainie: implikacje dla działań zewnętrznych Unii Europejskiej, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations”, no. 3(51).
TERESZKIEWICZ Filip (2016), Konstruktywizm jako perspektywa badawcza w wyjaśnianiu zachowań eurosceptyków w Parlamencie Europejskim w obszarze działań zewnętrznych Unii Europejskiej, „Przegląd Europejski”, no. 3(41).
Other articles from the issue
- constructivist institutionalismColin Hay’s constructivist institutional theoryprocess-tracing methodologyfederalisationinstitutional changeItalian federalism
Federalizzazione dell’Italia: the transition of Italian political system through the lenses of constructivist institutionalism
- rules of originGeneralised System of Preferences (GSP)Everything but Arms (EBA)the European Union (EU)least developed countries (LDC)customs duty
Significance of rules of origin in European Union’s unilateral Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for Everything But Arms system’s beneficiaries
- European UnionPolandpolitical partiespolitical leadersparliamentary discourseEuropean solidarity
European solidarity: perceptions and declarations of party leaders in Poland
Similar publications
- constructivist institutionalismColin Hay’s constructivist institutional theoryprocess-tracing methodologyfederalisationinstitutional changeItalian federalism
Federalizzazione dell’Italia: the transition of Italian political system through the lenses of constructivist institutionalism
- rules of originGeneralised System of Preferences (GSP)Everything but Arms (EBA)the European Union (EU)least developed countries (LDC)customs duty
Significance of rules of origin in European Union’s unilateral Generalised System of Preferences (GSP) for Everything But Arms system’s beneficiaries
- European UnionPolandpolitical partiespolitical leadersparliamentary discourseEuropean solidarity
European solidarity: perceptions and declarations of party leaders in Poland