en
Przegląd Europejski – European Studies Quarterly

From openness to increasing protectionism: the factors influencing the EU’s changing approach to Chinese direct investment in the European market

2026, 2026, No. 1

Ewa Radomska

0000-0002-9503-534X

University of the National Education Commission, Krakow

DOI

10.31338/1641-2478pe.1.26.2

Publication date

28.04.2026

Submission date

07.12.2025

Publishing model

open access

License type

CC BY 4.0 Int.

Field

Social sciences

Discipline

international relations, economics and finance, communication and media studies, political science and public administration, management and quality studies, law, sociology

Language of publication

English

Downloads

PDF 250 KB

Article

Number of views:17

Number of downloads:18

Crossref citations:0

Altmetric score:0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to explain the factors underlying the European Union’s changing approach to Chinese direct investment in the European market between 2000 and 2024. The research hypothesis assumes that the EU’s shift from openness to increasing protectionism in response to Chinese direct investment is driven by fears surrounding the possible negative effects of excessive Chinese political influence and dependence on China, which are perceived as threats to the EU’s security and competitiveness. The research was conducted using a descriptive method based on the analysis and critique of scientific literature, documents, legal acts, reports and statistical data. The analysis demonstrated that during the study period (2000–2024) the value of capital in the form of foreign direct investment (FDI) from Chinese companies in the European market increased, despite significant changes in the annual inflows of these investments and their structure. This trend resulted from several factors, one of the most important being the EU’s change in approach to incoming foreign direct investment from China. It began to be perceived as a threat to European industry and national security. Concerns about the possible negative effects of excessive Chinese political influence on the European economy, coupled with dependence on China, meant that the EU’s initial openness to Chinese direct investment gave way to increasing protectionism. The various institutional and legal instruments introduced to protect the Single European Market will increase in line with the EU’s efforts to strengthen its strategic independence, security, resilience, and competitiveness. It is important to strike the right balance when using market protection instruments. If they are too restrictive, they could result in an outflow of foreign capital (including Chinese capital) from the European economy, which would not be in the EU’s interest. Keywords: foreign direct investment (FDI), protectionism, European Union, China.

Keywords:

foreign direct investment (FDI),protectionism,European Union,China

Bibliography

AMIGHINI Alessia A. (2018), Beyond Ports and Transport Infrastructure: The Geo‑Economic Impact of the BRI on the European Union, in: A. Arduino, X. Gong (eds), Securing the Belt and Road Initiative, Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7116-4_14

BARTSCH Bernhard, WESSLING Claudia (eds) (2023), From a China strategy to no strategy at all: Exploring the diversity of European approaches, A Report by the European Think-tank Network on China (ETNC), The Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), Berlin, https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2023-08/ETNC_Report_2023_final.pdf (31.07.2023).

BÉNASSY-QUÉRÉ Agnès, COUPET Maylis, MAYER Thierry (2007), Institutional Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment, „The World Economy”, vol. 30, no. 5.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01022.x

BISSOON Ourvashi (2011), Can Better Institutions Attract More Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)? Evidencefrom developing countries, „Journal of European Economy”, vol. 11.

BRINZA Andreea, BĒRZIŅA-ČERENKOVA Una Aleksandra, LE CORRE Philippe, SEAMAN John, TURCSÁNYI Richard, VLADISAVLJEV Stefan (2024), EU-China relations: De-risking or de-coupling – the future of the EU strategy towards China, European Parliament, PE 754.446, March 2024, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2024/754446/EXPO_STU(2024)754446_EN.pdf (31.03.2024).

BVIRINDI Tinashe C., INALEGWU Ode-Ichakpa (2023), The impact of the global financial crisis and the European sovereign debt crisis on the capital structure of firms in Europe: do SMEs, and listed firms respond the same?, „The European Journal of Finance”, vol. 30, no. 8.

https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2023.2244553

CCCEU (2024), Facing Challenges, Forging Ahead: CCCEU Report on the Development of Chinese Companies in the EU 2024/2025, China Chamber of Commerce to the EU, Roland Berger, Brussels, http://en.ccceu.eu/flagshipreports.html (09.12.2024).

DE GRAUWE Paul (2010), The Financial Crisis and the Future of the Eurozone, “Bruges European Economic Policy Briefings”, BEEP No 21, College of Europe, Department of European Economic Studies, Bruges, https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/beep21_0.pdf (30.11.2010).

DELLA POSTA Pompeo, TALANI Leila S. (eds) (2011), Europe and the Financial Crisis, Palgrave Macmillan, New Jork.

DELLIS Konstantinos, SONDERMANN David, VANSTEENKISTE Isabel (2022), Drivers of Genuine FDI Inflows in Advanced Economies, „The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance”, vol. 84.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2020.09.004

DIRECTIVE (EU) 2022/2464 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting, OJ L 322, 16.12.2022.

DIRECTIVE (EU) 2024/1760 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859, OJ L, 2024/1760, 5.07.2024.

DUNNING John H. (1979), Explaining changing patterns of international production: in defence of the eclectic theory, „Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics”, vol. 41, no. 4.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1979.mp41004003.x

DUNNING John H. (1980), Toward an Eclectic Theory of International Production: Some empirical tests, „Journal of International Business Studies”, vol. 11, no. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593

DUNNING John H. (1998), Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A neglected factor?, „Journal of International Business Studies”, vol. 29, no. 1.

https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490024

DUNNING John H. (2006). Towards a New Paradigm of Development: Implications for the determinants of international business activity, „Transnational Corporation”. vol. 15, no. 1.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2019), Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: EU-China – A strategic outlook, JOIN(2019) 5 final, Strasbourg,

12.03.2019.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2022), Commission Staff Working Document: A Chips Act for Europe, SWD(2022) 147 final, Brussels, 11.05.2022.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2023a), Joint Communication to The European Parliament, The European Council and The Council on „European Economic Security Strategy”, JOIN(2023) 20 final, Brussels, 20.06.2023.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2023b), Commission launches investigation on subsidised electric cars from China, Press release, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_23_4752/IP_23_4752_EN.pdf (04.10.2023).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2024), Commission discloses to interested parties draft definitive findings of anti-subsidy investigation into imports of battery electric vehicles from China, Press release, Brussels, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/api/files/document/print/en/ip_24_4301/IP_24_4301_EN.pdf (20.08.2024).

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2025), The future of European competitiveness, Part A: A competitiveness strategy for Europe, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2020), Strategic sovereignty for Europe, Briefing, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), PE 652.069, Brussels, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/652069/EPRS_BRI(2020)652069_EN.pdf (30.09.2020).

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2021). European Parliament Resolution of 20 May 2021 on Chinese Countersanctions on EU Entities and MEPs and MPs, 2021/2644(RSP), Brussels, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0255_EN.html (20.05.2021).

GARLICK Jeremy (2019), China’s Economic Diplomacy in Central and Eastern Europe: A case of offensive mercantilism?, „Europe‑Asia Studies”. vol. 71, no. 8.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1648764

HENISZ Witold J. (2000), The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment, „Journal of Law, Economics and Organization”, vol. 16, no. 2.

JIANG Shixue (2012), The European Debt Crisis in a Chinese Perspective, “Working Paper Series on European Studies”, vol. 6, no. 3, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of European Studies, Beijing.

KRATZ Agatha, ZENGLEIN Max J., SEBASTIAN Gregor, WITZKE Mark (2022), Chinese FDI in Europe: 2021 update. Investments remain on downward trajectory – focus on venture capital, Report, Rhodium Group, The Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), Berlin, https://rhg.com/research/chinese-fdi-in-europe-2021-update/ (27.04.2022).

KRATZ Agatha, ZENGLEIN Max J., MISCHER Andreas, SEBASTIAN Gregor, MEYER Armand (2025), Chinese investment rebounds despite growing frictions – Chinese FDI in Europe: 2024 Update, Report, Rhodium Group and The Mercator Institute for China Studies (MERICS), Berlin, https://merics.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/MERICS-Rhodium-Group-COFDI-Update-2025_FINAL_0.pdf (31.05.2025).

LI Yuan, HE Zhigao (2022), The Remaking of China-EUrope Relations in the New Era of US-China Antagonism, „Journal of Chinese Political Science”, vol. 27, no. 3.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09792-5

MEUNIER Sophie (2015), A Tale of Two Ports: The epic story of Chinese direct investment in the Greek port of Piraeus, Council for European Studies, https://mnccenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Meunier-A-Tale-of-Two-Ports-CritCom.pdf (14.12.2015).

MEUNIER Sophie (2019), Beware of Chinese Bearing Gifts: Why China’s direct investment poses political challenges in Europe and the United States, in: Julien Chaisse (ed.), China’s International Investment Strategy: Bilateral, regional, and global law and policy, Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198827450.003.0019

MOROZOWSKI Tomasz (2020), Don’t Make a Rival out of the Dragon: Rethinking the EU–China Policy, „The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies”, vol. 1.

https://doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2020.003

NDRC (2015), Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st‑Century Maritime Silk Road, National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), People’s Republic of China, Beijing, http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html (28.03.2015).

OECD (2008), OECD Investment Policy Reviews. China. Encouraging Responsible Business Conduct, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2008/11/oecd-investment-policy-reviews-china-2008_g1gh9a03/9789264053717-en.pdf (30.11.2008).

PAVLIĆEVIĆ Dragan (2018), ‘China threat’ and ‘China opportunity’: Politics of dreams and fears in China‑Central and Eastern European relations, „Journal of Contemporary China”, vol. 27, no. 113.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1458057

PEDROSO Paulo (2014), Portugal and the Global Crisis. The impact of austerity on the economy, the social model and the performance of the state, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Berlin.

PEW RESEARCH CENTER (2025), China Global Image, https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/international-affairs/global-image-of-countries/china-global-image/ (09.12.2025).

POLITI Alice (2023), The paradigm-shift in EU–China relations and the limits of the EU’s current strategy towards China: a relational perspective, „Asian Affairs”, vol. 54, no. 4.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2023.2281164

RADOMSKA Ewa (2023a), The impact of foreign direct investment on the host economy of FDI: the case of China – a review of research, „Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna”, vol. 3(78)2023.

https://doi.org/10.26399/meip.3(78).2023.22/e.radomska

RADOMSKA Ewa (2023b), Unia Europejska i Chiny wobec zagranicznych inwestycji bezpośrednich.Trendy – wyzwania – perspektywy, Kraków.

REGULATION (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union, OJ 79 I/1, 21.03.2019.

REGULATION (EU) 2022/1031 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 June 2022 on the access of third-country economic operators, goods and services to the Union’s public procurement and concession markets and procedures supporting negotiations on access of Union economic operators, goods and services to the public procurement and concession markets of third countries (International Procurement Instrument – IPI), OJ L 173/1, 30.6.2022.

REGULATION (EU) 2022/2560 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on foreign subsidies distorting the internal market, OJ L 330, 23.12.2022.

REGULATION (EU) 2023/2675 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 22 November 2023 on the protection of the Union and its Member States from economic coercion by third countries, OJ L, 2023/2675, 07.12.2023.

REGULATION (EU) 2024/3015 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 27 November 2024 on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, OJ L, 2024/3015, 12.12.2024.

SAVONA Paolo, KIRTON John J., OLDANI Chiara (eds) (2011), Global Financial Crisis: Global Impact and Solutions, Routledge, London.

SILVA Joaquim R. (2015), Foreign direct investment in the context of the financial crisis and bailout: Portugal, in: B. Golgoczi, J. Drahokoupil, M. Bernaciak (eds), Foreign investment in eastern and southern Europe after 2008. Still a lever of growth?, European Trade Union Institute (ETUI), Brussels.

STEIN Roland M., VON RUMMEL Leonard (2021), Germany, in: O. Borgers (ed.), Foreign Investment Review 2021. Lexology. Getting The Deal through, Law Business Research, London.

TOMCZAK Kamila (2023), Transmission of the 2007–2008 financial crisis in advanced countries of the European Union, „Bulletin of Economic Research”, vol. 75, issue 1.

https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12338

TONCHEV Plamen, DAVARINOU Polyxeni (2017), Chinese Investment in Greece and the Big Picture of Sino-Greek Relations, Institute of International Economic Relations (IIER), Athens, https://idos.gr/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Chinese-Investment-in-Greece_4-12-2017.pdf (04.12.2017).

TURCSÁNYI Richard, KACHLIKOVA Eva (2020), The BRI and China’s Soft Power in Europe: Why Chinese narratives (initially) won, „Journal of Current Chinese Affairs”. vol. 49, issue 1.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102620963134

UNCTAD (2025), World Investment Report 2025. International investment in the digital economy, United Nations Publications, New York, https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2025 (19.06.2025).

VOGT Roland (2012), Europe and China: A maturing relationship, in: R. Vogt (ed.), Europe and China, Strategic Partners or Rivals?, Hong Kong University Press.

WANG Henry H., MIAO Mabel L. (eds) (2024). The Future of China’s Development and Globalization. China and Globalization, Springer, Singapore.

WANG Shaotang, YANG Lingyi, LI Guozhen (2025), The UK’s Foreign Investment Security Review Mechanism: Characteristics, Origins, and Responses, „Laws”, vol. 14, issue 2.

https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14020024

Similar publications