The method of voting in the British Parliament – between tradition and functionality.
2019, No. 1
Krakow University of Economics (Cracow, Poland)
Publication date
Publishing model
License type
Field
Discipline
Language of publication
Downloads
PDF 152 KB
Number of views:229
Number of downloads:55
Crossref citations:0
Altmetric score:0
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the method of voting, which is typical for the British Parliament. This method is referred to as “division”, because both Members of Parliament (MPs) and Lords are literally divided into two groups – supporters and opponents of the issue being voted – and cast their vote in special rooms called division lobbies. The author presents the process of such “division” and explains some additional issues related to voting and the rules that are used to determine its final results. The paper also describes successful and failed attempts to change this system that took place at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries. Using legal and institutional analysis method, the author explains why this system is so persistent, and proves the thesis that despite some minor modifications that have been made to it, one should not expect it to be replaced by some form of electronic voting.
Bibliography
CONSULTATION PAPER ON VOTING METHODS (1998), Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons Fifth Report, 29 April 1998, HC 699.
DANEL Łukasz (2014), Izba Lordów w parlamentaryzmie brytyjskim, Warszawa.
HOUSE OF COMMONS (2017), Standing Orders. Public Business 2017, HC 4.
HOUSE OF LORDS (2016), The Standing Orders of the House of Lords relating to public business, HL Paper 3.
HOUSE OF LORDS (2017), Companion to the Standing Orders and Guide to the Proceedings of the House of Lords.
JACK Malcolm et al. (red.) (2011), Erskine May’s treatise on the law, privileges, proceedings and usage of Parliament, 24th edition, London.
KELLY Richard (2018), Deferred divisions, Standard Note: SN/PC/00612, House of Commons Library.
KELSO Alexandra (2007), The House of Commons Modernisation Committee: Who Needs It?, “British Journal of Politics and International Relation”, vol. 9, no. 1.
NODDING THROUGH (WWW), https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/nodding-through-on-the-nod (12.07.2017).
PROGRAMMING OF LEGISLATION AND TIMING OF VOTES (2000), Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons Second Report, 6 July 2000, HC 589.
ROBERTSON Mary, ELIAS Thomas (2006), Handbook of House of Lords Procedure, 2nd edition, London.
ROGERS Robert, WALTERS Rhodri (2006), How Parliament Works, 6th edition, Harlow.
SANDFORD Mark (2013), Divisions in the House of Commons: House of Commons Background Paper, Standard Note: SN/PC/06401, House of Commons Library.
VOTING METHODS (1998), Select Committee on Modernisation of the House of Commons Sixth Report, 5 June 1998, HC 779.
Other articles from the issue
Spis treści / Contents
- Brexitliberalismthe European integration
Brexit in the context of liberal theory of international relations
Artur Niedźwiecki
- parliamentPapua New GuineaWestminster model
The importance of the Westminster model in shaping the political position of the parliament in Papua New Guinea
Justyna Eska-Mikołajewska
Similar publications
19.11.2019
parliamentgovernmentopinioncooperationcontrolEU member statesPolish Sejm and Senate, and challenges of the European Union
Ilona Grądzka
29.06.2014
European UnionEurobarometereuroscepticismUnited KingdomPublic opinion attitudes towards the European Union and its future in the United Kingdom. Study based on the results of Eurobarometer surveys in the UK and Poland
Beata Słupek
30.03.2020
European UnionUnited KingdomLabour PartyThe Labour Party politicians for Leave in 2016 referendum
Filip Ilkowski